Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39624390›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2024

The development of the Cough Hypersensitivity Questionnaire for chronic cough.

Barnaby Hirons, Peter S P Cho, Chris Krägeloh, Richard J Siegert, Richard Turner, Katherine Rhatigan, Harini Kesavan, Ewan Mackay, Ha-Kyeong Won, Ju-Young Kim and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Age-Dependent Role of Cough Hypersensitivity in Transition to Refractory Chronic Cough.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Barnaby HironsDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, King's College Hospital, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5049-6820
Peter S P ChoDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, King's College Hospital, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8689-8541
Chris KrägelohDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Aukland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7298-0736
Richard J SiegertDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Aukland, New Zealand.
Richard TurnerSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3024-6971
Katherine RhatiganDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
Harini KesavanDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
Ewan MackayDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
Ha-Kyeong WonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Veterans Health Service Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Ju-Young KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Bundang Jesaeng General Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Woo-Jung SongDepartment of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4630-9922
Surinder S BirringDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, King's College Hospital, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic cough is considered a disorder of neuronal hypersensitivity in which patients frequently report abnormal laryngeal and chest sensations, and excessive triggers. To facilitate clinical assessment, we developed the Cough Hypersensitivity Questionnaire (CHQ). Methods: Candidate questionnaire items were developed following interviews with patients with refractory chronic cough (n=10, United Kingdom), and review by a multidisciplinary team. The CHQ was evaluated in individuals with chronic cough (n=535, UK/South Korea), for unidimensionality and differential item functioning (with Rasch analysis), internal consistency, concurrent validity (against cough severity visual analogue scale (VAS) and Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) scores), and content validity (cognitive debriefing interviews, n=13). Results: Concept elicitation created a pool of 34 items. Eleven items were removed following multidisciplinary team review of patient interviews. Rasch analysis confirmed the CHQ total score to be a unidimensional scale; one item was removed due to differential item functioning. The final 22 binary-item CHQ comprises 6 sensation-related and 16 trigger-related items. Median (interquartile range) total CHQ scores were 9 (6-12); sensations 4 (2-5) and triggers 5 (3-8). Internal consistency was good (person separation index 0.74). The CHQ total score was moderately associated with cough severity VAS (0.42, p=0.005) and LCQ total score (ρ=-0.52, p<0.001). In cognitive debriefing, patients found that the CHQ was relevant to their condition and simple to complete. Conclusion: The CHQ is simple to use and has validity for assessing cough triggers and sensations in patients with chronic cough. Further studies are needed to assess its repeatability, responsiveness and clinical utility.

Identifiers

PMID39624390
PMCPMC11610079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.