ArticleERJ open research2024
The development of the Cough Hypersensitivity Questionnaire for chronic cough.
Article in ERJ open research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Age-Dependent Role of Cough Hypersensitivity in Transition to Refractory Chronic Cough.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2026Article
- Prevalence and associated factors of cough syncope in patients with chronic cough: a multicentre prospective study.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- Article
- Clarifying Terminology in Chronic Cough: The Evolving Role of Cough Hypersensitivity Syndrome.The clinical respiratory journal · 2026Review
- Observational
- Objective Assessment of the Cough: Listening to the Patient's Voice. A Narrative Review.Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases · 2026Article
- Cough Assessment in Chronic Respiratory Diseases (COASESS): Findings from a Prospective Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases · 2026Article
- Clinical Efficacy of Acupuncture as Adjunctive Therapy for Cough Variant Asthma: Study Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2026Article
- RFC1 Repeat Expansion in Chronic Cough: Findings From the Korean Chronic Cough Registry.Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2026Article
- Observational
- Assessment of cough in asthma patients attending clinic using the cough questionnaire for asthma (CQA).Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Article
- Association of throat sensation severity with quality of life in patients with chronic cough.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Observational
- Real-world usage and response to gefapixant in refractory chronic cough.ERJ open research · 2025Article
- Treatable traits in chronic cough: a prospective evaluation for predicting cough persistence.ERJ open research · 2025Article
- How Will a Treatable Traits Approach Reshape Clinical Practice in Chronic Cough?Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2025Review
- Patient-reported assessments of chronic cough in clinical trials: accessory or primary endpoints?Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Chronic cough is considered a disorder of neuronal hypersensitivity in which patients frequently report abnormal laryngeal and chest sensations, and excessive triggers. To facilitate clinical assessment, we developed the Cough Hypersensitivity Questionnaire (CHQ). Methods: Candidate questionnaire items were developed following interviews with patients with refractory chronic cough (n=10, United Kingdom), and review by a multidisciplinary team. The CHQ was evaluated in individuals with chronic cough (n=535, UK/South Korea), for unidimensionality and differential item functioning (with Rasch analysis), internal consistency, concurrent validity (against cough severity visual analogue scale (VAS) and Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) scores), and content validity (cognitive debriefing interviews, n=13). Results: Concept elicitation created a pool of 34 items. Eleven items were removed following multidisciplinary team review of patient interviews. Rasch analysis confirmed the CHQ total score to be a unidimensional scale; one item was removed due to differential item functioning. The final 22 binary-item CHQ comprises 6 sensation-related and 16 trigger-related items. Median (interquartile range) total CHQ scores were 9 (6-12); sensations 4 (2-5) and triggers 5 (3-8). Internal consistency was good (person separation index 0.74). The CHQ total score was moderately associated with cough severity VAS (0.42, p=0.005) and LCQ total score (ρ=-0.52, p<0.001). In cognitive debriefing, patients found that the CHQ was relevant to their condition and simple to complete. Conclusion: The CHQ is simple to use and has validity for assessing cough triggers and sensations in patients with chronic cough. Further studies are needed to assess its repeatability, responsiveness and clinical utility.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.