ArticleERJ open research2024
Biomarkers troponin and procalcitonin in addition to CRB-65 enhance risk stratification in patients with community-acquired pneumonia.
Article in ERJ open research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis of factors associated with severe disease and construction of a monogram for elderly patients with community-acquired pneumonia complicated by heart failure.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Prognostic value of cardiac troponin I in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia: A retrospective cohort study.Medicine · 2026Article
- Alpha-1 antitrypsin as a new biomarker of inflammation, infection and disease severity in community-acquired pneumonia: a prospective cohort study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a nomogram integrating inflammatory-nutritional-metabolic composite indices for predicting short-term adverse outcomes in hospitalized patients with pneumonia.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Endothelin-1 in combination with CRB-65 enhance risk stratification in COVID-19 patients.Infection · 2025Article
- A machine learning-based model for assessing community-acquired pneumonia severity using routine blood tests.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) remains a leading cause of infectious disease mortality globally, necessitating intensive care unit (ICU) admission for ∼10% of hospitalised patients. Accurate prediction of disease severity facilitates timely therapeutic interventions. Methods: Our study aimed to enhance the predictive capacity of the clinical CRB-65 score by evaluating eight candidate biomarkers: troponin T high-sensitive (TnT-hs), procalcitonin (PCT), N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, angiopoietin-2, copeptin, endothelin-1, lipocalin-2 and mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin. We utilised a machine-learning approach on 800 samples from the German CAPNETZ network (competence network for CAP) to refine risk prediction models combining these biomarkers with the CRB-65 score regarding our defined end-point: death or ICU admission during the current CAP episode within 28 days after study inclusion. Results: Elevated levels of biomarkers were associated with the end-point. TnT-hs exhibited the highest predictive performance among individual features (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, AUC=0.74), followed closely by PCT (AUC=0.73). Combining biomarkers with the CRB-65 score significantly improved prediction accuracy. The combined model of CRB-65, TnT-hs and PCT demonstrated the best balance between high predictive value and parsimony, with an AUC of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.72-0.82), while CRB-65 alone achieved an AUC of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.64-0.73). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that augmenting the CRB-65 score with TnT-hs and PCT enhances the prediction of death or ICU admission in hospitalised CAP patients. Validation of this improved risk score in additional CAP cohorts and prospective clinical studies is warranted to assess its broad clinical utility.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.