Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39624355›Full record

ArticleWestern Pacific surveillance and response journal : WPSAR

Incorporating One Health into a front-line field epidemiological training programme in Papua New Guinea: lessons learned.

Kelitha Malio, Bethseba Peni, Elaine Hevoho, Abel Yamba, Alois Pukienei, Laura Macfarlane-Berry, Trinidad Velasco Ortuzar, Barry Ropa, Ilagi Puana, Therese Kearns and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Western Pacific surveillance and response journal : WPSAR. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kelitha MalioWorld Vision Papua New Guinea, Boroko, National Capital District, PapuaNew Guinea.
Bethseba PeniField Epidemiology Training Program, National Department of Health, Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea.
Elaine HevohoNational Agriculture Quarantine & Inspection Authority, Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea.
Abel YambaField Epidemiology Training Program, National Department of Health, Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea.
Alois PukieneiField Epidemiology Training Program, National Department of Health, Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea.
Laura Macfarlane-BerryUniversity of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Trinidad Velasco OrtuzarUniversity of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Barry RopaField Epidemiology Training Program, National Department of Health, Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea.
Ilagi PuanaNational Agriculture Quarantine & Inspection Authority, Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea.
Therese KearnsUniversity of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Tambri HousenUniversity of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Problem: Over the past two decades, there has been increased recognition of the importance of a more holistic approach to preventing, predicting, detecting and responding to public health threats. The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need to bring together environmental, human and animal health sectors in addressing public health threats and the need to develop skilled front-line workers to act as surge capacity during health emergencies. Context: Papua New Guinea is a high-risk country for emerging and re-emerging pathogens. The effects of climate change, human-mediated encroachment on natural habitats and destructive land-use practices have threatened ecosystems and caused environmental damage. The movement of goods, animals and people over porous borders provides opportunities for the introduction and spread of new pathogens. Action: In recognition of the importance of multisectoral responses to health threats in Papua New Guinea, and the need to train front-line workers, we designed and piloted a 3-month One Health in-service training programme for front-line workers from across all sectors. Lessons learned: The co-creation of curricula was essential in ensuring the relevance of the programme to front-line workers from multiple sectors, and the development of provincial training teams was key to ensuring mentorship and programme sustainability. Bringing front-line workers together in joint trainings facilitated the building of relationships, the understanding of the roles and responsibilities of the various sectors, the identification of sectoral focal points and the development of informal networks. Discussion: Papua New Guinea's One Health front-line Field Epidemiology Training Program demonstrated that investment in cross-sectoral training programmes can be a catalyst for the implementation of One Health approaches on the front line.

Indexed as

COVID-19One HealthEpidemiologyHumansPapua New GuineaSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID39624355
PMCPMC11609401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.