ReviewJournal of physical therapy science2024
A feasibility study on physical therapist interventions in the Japanese integrated health services and preventive care program for older adults.
Review in Journal of physical therapy science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] This study examined the feasibility of including physical therapists in the Health Services and Preventive Care program at community gatherings. [Participants and Methods] The participants were 56 older adults from five community gatherings who did not have a long-term care insurance service. As part of the Health Services and Preventive Care program, interventions by physical therapists were conducted for 90 minutes once a month for 6 months at five community gatherings, which involved exercises, and home-based exercises. The feasibility outcomes were dropout rate, number of times people participated in the program, and understanding of frailty. The effectiveness outcomes were frailty, grip strength, walking speed, and five-times-sit-to-stand test. [Results] The feasibility study results showed a dropout rate of 4.3%, 4.7 ± 0.4 times participation, and a 93.2% frailty understanding. Effectiveness outcomes revealed no increase in frailty. The physical indices showed that all participants statistically improved in the five-times-sit-to-stand test (Pre: 7.3 ± 2.3 times, Post: 6.5 ± 7.6 times). [Conclusion] The results of the feasibility study indicate that the program is feasible because of the high rates of completion and frailty prevention understanding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.