Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39624345›Full record

ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2024

Examination of evaluation indicators for spasticity in stroke patients using ultrasound imaging equipment.

Takahiro Okazaki, Shota Nagai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Takahiro OkazakiRehabilitation Center, Kaga Medical Center: Ri-36 Sakumi, Kaga City, Ishikawa 922-8522, Japan.
Shota NagaiGraduate School of Comprehensive Rehabilitation, Kinjo University, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

[Purpose] To compare the muscle evaluation indices obtained by scanning the spastic muscles of stroke patients between the paretic and non-paretic sides using ultrasound imaging equipment, determine whether any features can be detected, and verify whether the evaluation indices that detect differences are valid for measuring the degree of spasticity. [Participants and Methods] The participants were 23 first-ever stroke patients with motor paralysis in one upper or lower limb, admitted to our hospital between 1 and 6 months after onset. The biceps brachii muscle and medial head of the gastrocnemius muscle were evaluated on both sides using ultrasound imaging equipment. The muscle evaluation indices were muscle thickness, muscle echo intensity, muscle stiffness, and muscle-tendon junction displacement. Pennation angles were also measured at the medial head of the gastrocnemius muscle. [Results] Significant differences were found between the paretic and nonparetic sides in the muscle-tendon junction displacement of the biceps brachii muscle and edial head of the gastrocnemius muscle. No significant differences were found in the other muscle evaluation indices. [Conclusion] Muscle-tendon junction displacement was the only index that showed significant differences between the non-paretic and paretic sides. It showed a moderate-to-strong correlation with the Modified Ashworth Scale, suggesting its potential as an alternative evaluation index for muscle strain.

Indexed as

Skeletal muscleStrokeUltrasound imaging equipment

Identifiers

PMID39624345
PMCPMC11608650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.