Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39624299›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Profiling public perception of emerging technologies: Gene editing, brain chips and exoskeletons. A data-analytics framework.

Simona-Vasilica Oprea, Adela Bâra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Simona-Vasilica OpreaBucharest University of Economic Studies, Department of Economic Informatics and Cybernetics, No. 6 Piaţa Romană, Bucharest, 010374, Romania.
Adela BâraBucharest University of Economic Studies, Department of Economic Informatics and Cybernetics, No. 6 Piaţa Romană, Bucharest, 010374, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three AI developments, classified as forms of human enhancements, center around progress at the intersection of AI, nanotechnology and biotechnology. Our research advances the understanding of AI and human enhancement by data-driven analytics and offers practical tools for future research and societal applications. It is based on a survey that was launched by PRC in February 2021 to more than 5,000 respondents from the U.S. It consists of about 100 questions that are grouped using a prefix code by the 3 above-mentioned human enhancement, science role, concerns and excitements, perceived algorithm fairness and demographics. To investigate this survey and extract insights regarding the general attitude, a data analytics framework is proposed that consists of clustering using DBSCAN and K-means, ANOVA for clusters, PCA, t-SNE and UMAP for graphical visualization, prediction and advanced customers' profiles analyses. Both clustering methods indicate distinct profiles for AI customers. Most of them are moderate, but two smaller groups define the tech-ethics advocates and tech-forward visionaries. For prediction, in the multi-class classification task, the ROC-AUC score is 0.852 and average F1 Score is 0.987. Following the results, both technology creators and legislators must work collaboratively to ensure that technological advancements are ethically grounded, widely accepted and aligned with societal values.

Indexed as

AIData analytics frameworkHuman enhancementsMachine learningQuestionnaire

Identifiers

PMID39624299
PMCPMC11609246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.