ArticleHeliyon2024
Profiling public perception of emerging technologies: Gene editing, brain chips and exoskeletons. A data-analytics framework.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three AI developments, classified as forms of human enhancements, center around progress at the intersection of AI, nanotechnology and biotechnology. Our research advances the understanding of AI and human enhancement by data-driven analytics and offers practical tools for future research and societal applications. It is based on a survey that was launched by PRC in February 2021 to more than 5,000 respondents from the U.S. It consists of about 100 questions that are grouped using a prefix code by the 3 above-mentioned human enhancement, science role, concerns and excitements, perceived algorithm fairness and demographics. To investigate this survey and extract insights regarding the general attitude, a data analytics framework is proposed that consists of clustering using DBSCAN and K-means, ANOVA for clusters, PCA, t-SNE and UMAP for graphical visualization, prediction and advanced customers' profiles analyses. Both clustering methods indicate distinct profiles for AI customers. Most of them are moderate, but two smaller groups define the tech-ethics advocates and tech-forward visionaries. For prediction, in the multi-class classification task, the ROC-AUC score is 0.852 and average F1 Score is 0.987. Following the results, both technology creators and legislators must work collaboratively to ensure that technological advancements are ethically grounded, widely accepted and aligned with societal values.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.