Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39624286›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Securing consensus in fractional-order multi-agent systems: Algebraic approaches against Byzantine attacks.

Yubin Zhong, Asad Khan, Muhammad Awais Javeed, Hassan Raza, Waqar Ul Hassan, Azmat Ullah Khan Niazi, Muhammad Usman Mehmood

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yubin ZhongSchool of Mathematics and Information Science, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, PR China.
Asad KhanMetaverse Research Institute, School of Computer Science and Cyber Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, PR China.
Muhammad Awais JaveedSchool of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 211189, PR China.
Hassan RazaDepartment of Mathematics, School of Science, Mathematics and Technology, Wenzhou-Kean University, Wenzhou, PR China.
Waqar Ul HassanDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Lahore, Sargodha 40100, Pakistan.
Azmat Ullah Khan NiaziDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Lahore, Sargodha 40100, Pakistan.
Muhammad Usman MehmoodDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Lahore, Sargodha 40100, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper investigates the behavior of fractional-order nonlinear multi-agent systems subjected to Byzantine assaults, specifically focusing on the manipulations of both sensors and actuators. We employ weighted graphs, both directed and undirected, to illustrate the system's topology. Our methodology combines algebraic graph theory with fractional-order Lyapunov techniques to develop algebraic requirements for leader-following consensus, providing a robust framework for analyzing consensus dynamics in these complex systems. We present quantitative results demonstrating the effectiveness of our approach, including two numerical examples that validate the proposed requirements for consensus evaluation. Notably, our work highlights the novelty of using fractional-order systems to enhance resilience against adversarial conditions, contributing significantly to the field of multi-agent systems. By clarifying key terms and streamlining our language, we ensure accessibility for a broader audience while emphasizing the implications of our findings for real-world applications.

Indexed as

Byzantine attacksFractional-order Lyapunov approachFractional-order systemsLeader-following consensusNonlinear dynamics

Identifiers

PMID39624286
PMCPMC11609225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.