ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2024
On the feasibility of a robotic probe manipulator for echocardiography in the prone position.
Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Technological evolution and research frontiers of robot-assisted ultrasound examination: a bibliometric exploration.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiology: General Perspectives and Focus on Interventional Cardiology.Anatolian journal of cardiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robotic probe manipulator for echocardography (echo) can potentially reduce cardiac radiologists' physical burden. Echo procedure with industrial robots has wide Range of Motion (RoM) but poses safety risks because the robot may clamp the patient against the bed. Conversely, a soft robotic manipulator for echo has safe contact force but suffers from a limited RoM. Due to COVID-19, cardiac radiologists explored performing echo in the prone-positioned patients, which yielded good-quality images but was difficult to perform manually. From robot design perspective, prone position allows safer robot without clamping issue because all actuators are under the patient with minimal RoM to reach the cardiac windows. In this work, we propose a robotic probe manipulator for echo in the prone position employing a combination of a delta 3D printer and a soft end-effector and investigate its feasibility in a clinical setting. We implemented the robot as a scanner type device in which the probe manipulator scans from under a bed with an opening around the chest area. The doctor controls the robot with a joystick and a keypad while looking at a camera view of the chest area and the ultrasound display as feedback. For the experiments, three doctors and three medical students scanned the parasternal window of the same healthy subject with the robot and then manually. Two expert cardiologists evaluated the captured ultrasound images. All medical personnel could obtain all the required views with the robot, but the scanning time was considerably longer than the manual one. The ultrasound image quality scores of the doctors' group remained constant between manual and robotic scans. However, the image scores of the robotic scan were lower in the students' group. In summary, this work verified the ability to obtain clinically sufficient images in echocardiography in the prone position by expert medical doctors using the proposed robotic probe manipulator. Our robot can be further developed with semi automatic procedure to serve as a platform for safe and ergonomic echocardiography.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.