ArticleIranian journal of veterinary research2024
Detection of
Article in Iranian journal of veterinary research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Timely diagnosis of brucellosis is the starting point for effective programs to control brucellosis in humans and animals. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 738 raw milk samples were randomly collected from cattle, sheep, and goats. Milk samples were screened using the milk ring test (MRT). In addition, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method was applied to detect Results: Of the samples tested using MRT, 46 (6.23%, 95% CI: 2.83-9.63%) yielded positive results. Of the 46 seropositive samples, 42 (91.30%) were from sheep and 4 (8.70%) were from goats, while no bovine samples had positive MRT results. PCR analysis confirmed that 78.26% (36/46) of MRT-positive samples belonged to the genus Conclusion: The results obtained from MRT evaluation of milk samples did not align entirely with the findings of the molecular examinations. The PCR method has minimal biological contamination and high sensitivity and accuracy, especially for determining
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.