Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39624180›Full record

ArticleThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global2025

Evaluation of cephalosporin allergy: Survey of drug allergy experts.

Anna Brameli, Cosby A Stone, Elizabeth J Phillips

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anna BrameliDivision of Allergy, Pulmonary, and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn.
Cosby A StoneDivision of Allergy, Pulmonary, and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn.
Elizabeth J PhillipsDivision of Allergy, Pulmonary, and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Since the publication of the 2022 Drug Allergy Practice Parameters (DAPP) of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI) and American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (ACAAI), it is unclear the extent to which the simplified and risk-stratified evaluation of cephalosporin allergy has been incorporated into allergy practice. Objective: We aimed to assess current cephalosporin allergy testing practices using real case examples. Methods: An 18-question REDCap survey was sent to the 136 members of the Adverse Reactions to Drugs, Biologics and Latex (ARDBL) Committee of the AAAAI between February and April 2023. Results: Forty-six (33.8%) ARDBL members completed the survey after 3 email attempts. Most practiced in the United States (32, 69.6%), 6 (13.0%) in Canada, and the rest in Europe and Asia. Almost half (47.7%) reported that the 2022 DAPP had increased their use of direct oral challenge, and 91% would prescribe cephalosporins in the setting of low-risk penicillin allergy history without testing. For low-risk cephalosporin reactions, 68% would perform a direct oral challenge with the culprit drug. In severe immediate penicillin reactions, 23% would evaluate with penicillin skin test before assessing cephalosporin allergy. For cephalosporin-related anaphylaxis, 48% would perform cephalosporin-based tests. For perioperative anaphylaxis with cefazolin, 57% would perform cephalosporin-based tests. For positive skin test result to cefazolin, 79% chose to avoid the culprit drug with follow-up oral challenge to a structurally dissimilar cephalosporin. Conclusion: Increased uptake of direct oral challenge represents the initial impact of the 2022 DAPP. However, there is significant variation in testing practices of cephalosporin allergy even among drug allergy experts, reflecting a need for a firmer evidence base to guide consensus around testing for higher-risk reactions.

Indexed as

Adverse Reactions to Drugs, Biologics, and Latex Committee (ARDBL) of the AAAAIcephalosporinDrug allergydrug allergy practice parameter

Identifiers

PMID39624180
PMCPMC11609518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.