Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39624174›Full record

ArticleCase reports in women's health2024

Caesarean scar pregnancy complicated by partial rupture in the second trimester: A case report.

Prakriti Garkhail, Astrid S M Vinkesteijn, Sabina de Weerd

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Case reports in women's health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Prakriti GarkhailDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Albert Schweitzer hospital, Albert Schweitzerplaats 25, 3318 AT Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
Astrid S M VinkesteijnDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Albert Schweitzer hospital, Albert Schweitzerplaats 25, 3318 AT Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
Sabina de WeerdDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Albert Schweitzer hospital, Albert Schweitzerplaats 25, 3318 AT Dordrecht, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This case report examines caesarean scar pregnancy, a rare but significant complication associated with increasing global caesarean rates. It explores diagnostic challenges, therapeutic interventions, and the importance of a multidisciplinary approach. This report details the case of a patient at 13 + 4 weeks of amenorrhea presenting with severe abdominal pain, diagnosed with caesarean scar pregnancy and scar dehiscence causing major haemorrhage. Emergency surgery and interventional radiology were employed for pregnancy evacuation and haemorrhage control. This report emphasizes niche pregnancy complexities and underscores the need for evidence-based practices to mitigate maternal morbidity and mortality. Additionally, it emphasizes the need for training in niche detection by transvaginal ultrasound for all clinicians encountering patients with early pregnancies.

Indexed as

CaesareanNichePregnancyRuptureScarUterine

Identifiers

PMID39624174
PMCPMC11609501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.