ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2024
Topological embedding and directional feature importance in ensemble classifiers for multi-class classification.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Interpretable Omics-to-Image Transformer Framework for Cancer Prognosis Prediction.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Analysis of immune-related biomarkers in amniotic fluid embolism by sequencing data and bioinformatics.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer is the second leading cause of disease-related death worldwide, and machine learning-based identification of novel biomarkers is crucial for improving early detection and treatment of various cancers. A key challenge in applying machine learning to high-dimensional data is deriving important features in an interpretable manner to provide meaningful insights into the underlying biological mechanisms We developed a class-based directional feature importance (CLIFI) metric for decision tree methods and demonstrated its use for The Cancer Genome Atlas proteomics data. The CLIFI metric was incorporated into four algorithms, Random Forest (RF), LAtent VAriable Stochastic Ensemble of Trees (LAVASET), and Gradient Boosted Decision Trees (GBDTs), and a new extension incorporating the LAVA step into GBDTs (LAVABOOST). Both LAVA methods incorporate topological information from protein interactions into the decision function. The different models' performance in classifying 28 cancers resulted in F1-scores of 92.6% (RF), 92.0% (LAVASET), 89.3% (LAVABOOST) and 85.7% (GBDT), with no method outperforming all others for individual cancer type prediction. The CLIFI metric enables visualisation of the model's decision-making functions. The resulting CLIFI value distributions indicated heterogeneity in the expression of several proteins (MYH11, ER
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.