ArticleJournal of acute medicine2024
Neurological Manifestations of Aortic Dissection: A Scoping Review.
Article in Journal of acute medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dissected Thoracic Aorta Masked as Seizures: A Case Report.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- The interplay of ferroptosis and oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of aortic dissection.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aortic dissection (AD) is the most prevalent aortic pathology, with an incidence of 2.6-3.5 cases per 100,000 inhabitants per year with mortality rates as high as 90% at 3 months without proper management. Despite the presence of typical symptoms, it has been reported that up to 38% of cases go unnoticed in the initial evaluation, either due to additional symptomatology or the absence of classic symptoms. In 28% of cases the diagnosis is made post-mortem, highlighting the severity and importance of timely diagnosis. The main goals of this study were to identify the primary neurological manifestations of acute AD and the frequency of these manifestations in type A and B AD according to the Stanford classification. A total of 2,734 records were retrieved from two databases, of which 2,611 were excluded. Therefore, 123 articles were obtained and 88 were evaluated for eligibility. Consequently, 79 articles were included in the review. The abstracts identified in the search were screened by seven blinded independent authors and excluded those who lacked relevance. The authors read the full texts independently to determine inclusion. A third reviewer adjudicated discrepancies when opinions were at odds. There were 169 patients diagnosed with Stanford type A, of which 43.8% displayed quantitative impairment of consciousness. Within this group, transient loss of consciousness was observed in 34.3% of cases. Motor syndrome was present in 54.5%, with 23.7% of patients presenting with hemiparesis or hemiplegia. 3.6% had facial paresis or paralysis and less frequently monoparesis, paraparesis, hyperreflexia, spasticity, and muscle spasms. 7.6% presented with language impairments including Broca's aphasia and dysarthria. Seizures were present in 3.6%. Neuro-ophthalmological symptoms were 2.9%, cortical or cognitive symptoms and headache were 2.3%, cerebellar syndrome was 1.8%, and sensory syndrome was 1.2%. Of 86 patients diagnosed with Stanford type B, 57.0% displayed motor syndrome, with 50.0% being paraparesis or paraplegia, 4.7% monoplegia, and 2.3% hemiplegia or hemiparesis. Additionally, impairment of consciousness was present in 26.7%, sensory syndrome in 12.8%, and language impairments in 3.5%. In the emergency department, understanding the neurological manifestations in both Stanford type A and B dissections emerges as a pivotal cornerstone for conducting precise assessments and efficient patient management. Given the wide spectrum of manifestations, we emphasize the importance of suspecting AD when neurological disorders are associated with the classic symptoms. In these cases, we encourage a complete neurological examination to be performed and a multidisciplinary group assembled to tackle this entity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.