ArticleDiscover artificial intelligence2024
The effect of resampling techniques on the performances of machine learning clinical risk prediction models in the setting of severe class imbalance: development and internal validation in a retrospective cohort.
Article in Discover artificial intelligence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Demographic Shortcuts Account for Most of the Apparent Accuracy of Four-Class Gait-Based Differential Diagnosis in Neurodegenerative Disease: An Interpretability-Driven Audit of Machine Learning on a Public Gait Benchmark.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- PneumoScore: Risk Prediction Model for 90-Day Mortality After Lung Resection.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Observational
- Machine learning approaches to predict early cardiac immune-related adverse events in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Beyond Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve: Evaluating Predictive Performance Metrics Under Class Imbalance in Real-World Clinical Data.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Machine learning risk prediction models for medication harm in hospitalised adult patients.Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2026Article
- Using machine learning for early prediction of in-hospital mortality during ICU admission in liver cancer patients.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Using machine learning models to predict the risk of mild cognitive impairment for COPD patients: A multi-cohort study.Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The availability of population datasets and machine learning techniques heralded a new era of sophisticated prediction models involving a large number of routinely collected variables. However, severe class imbalance in clinical datasets is a major challenge. The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of commonly-used resampling techniques in combination with commonly-used machine learning algorithms in a clinical dataset, to determine whether combination(s) of these approaches improve upon the original multivariable logistic regression with no resampling. Methods: We previously developed and internally validated a multivariable logistic regression 30-day mortality prediction model in 30,619 patients using preoperative and intraoperative features.Using the same dataset, we systematically evaluated and compared model performances after application of resampling techniques [random under-sampling, near miss under-sampling, random oversampling, and synthetic minority oversampling (SMOTE)] in combination with machine learning algorithms (logistic regression, elastic net, decision trees, random forest, and extreme gradient boosting). Results: We found that in the setting of severe class imbalance, the impact of resampling techniques on model performance varied by the machine learning algorithm and the evaluation metric. Existing resampling techniques did not meaningfully improve area under receiving operating curve (AUROC). The area under the precision recall curve (AUPRC) was only increased by random under-sampling and SMOTE for decision trees, and oversampling and SMOTE for extreme gradient boosting. Importantly, some combinations of algorithm and resampling technique decreased AUROC and AUPRC compared to no resampling. Conclusion: Existing resampling techniques had a variable impact on models, depending on the algorithms and the evaluation metrics. Future research is needed to improve predictive performances in the setting of severe class imbalance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.