Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39624046›Full record

ArticleDiscover artificial intelligence2024

The effect of resampling techniques on the performances of machine learning clinical risk prediction models in the setting of severe class imbalance: development and internal validation in a retrospective cohort.

Janny Xue Chen Ke, Arunachalam DhakshinaMurthy, Ronald B George, Paula Branco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Discover artificial intelligence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Machine learning approaches to predict early cardiac immune-related adverse events in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Janny Xue Chen KeDepartment of Anesthesia, St. Paul's Hospital, Providence Health Care, 1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC V6Z1Y6 Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3121-9780
Arunachalam DhakshinaMurthySchool of Computer Science, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON Canada.
Ronald B GeorgeMount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada.
Paula BrancoSchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The availability of population datasets and machine learning techniques heralded a new era of sophisticated prediction models involving a large number of routinely collected variables. However, severe class imbalance in clinical datasets is a major challenge. The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of commonly-used resampling techniques in combination with commonly-used machine learning algorithms in a clinical dataset, to determine whether combination(s) of these approaches improve upon the original multivariable logistic regression with no resampling. Methods: We previously developed and internally validated a multivariable logistic regression 30-day mortality prediction model in 30,619 patients using preoperative and intraoperative features.Using the same dataset, we systematically evaluated and compared model performances after application of resampling techniques [random under-sampling, near miss under-sampling, random oversampling, and synthetic minority oversampling (SMOTE)] in combination with machine learning algorithms (logistic regression, elastic net, decision trees, random forest, and extreme gradient boosting). Results: We found that in the setting of severe class imbalance, the impact of resampling techniques on model performance varied by the machine learning algorithm and the evaluation metric. Existing resampling techniques did not meaningfully improve area under receiving operating curve (AUROC). The area under the precision recall curve (AUPRC) was only increased by random under-sampling and SMOTE for decision trees, and oversampling and SMOTE for extreme gradient boosting. Importantly, some combinations of algorithm and resampling technique decreased AUROC and AUPRC compared to no resampling. Conclusion: Existing resampling techniques had a variable impact on models, depending on the algorithms and the evaluation metrics. Future research is needed to improve predictive performances in the setting of severe class imbalance.

Indexed as

AnesthesiologyClass imbalanceMachine learningPredictive modelingResamplingRisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID39624046
PMCPMC11610218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.