SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2024
Application of machine learning in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: bibliometric analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In the past decade, the application of machine learning (ML) in the clinical management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB) has received much attention and has become a hot research topic. However, no scientometric report has systematically summarized and outlined the research progress in this field. Objective: This study aims to utilize bibliometric analysis methods to delve into the applications of machine learning in AUGIB and the collaborative network behind it over the past decade. Through a thorough analysis of relevant literature, we uncover the research trends and collaboration patterns in this field, which can provide valuable references and insights for further in-depth exploration in the same field. Methods: Using the Web of Science (WOS) as the data source, this study explores academic development in a specific field from December 2013 to December 2023. The search strategy included terms related to "Machine Learning" and "Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding". Only original articles in English focusing on ML in AUGIB were included. The analysis of downloaded literature with Citespace software, including keyword co-occurrence, author collaboration networks, and citation relationship networks, reveals academic dynamics, research hotspots, and collaboration trends. Results: After sorting and compiling, we have collected 73 academic papers written by 217 authors from 133 institutions in 29 countries worldwide. Among them, China and AM J GASTROENTEROL have made significant contributions in this field, providing many high-quality research achievements. The study found that these papers mainly focus on three core research hotspots: deepening clinical consensus, precise analysis of medical images, and optimization of data integration and decision support systems. Conclusions: This study summarizes the latest advancements in the application of machine learning to AUGIB research. Through bibliometric analysis and network visualization, it reveals emerging trends, origins, leading institutions, and hot topics in this field. While this area has already demonstrated significant potential in medical artificial intelligence, our findings will provide valuable insights for future research directions and clinical practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.