Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39624038›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

Nurses' knowledge, attitude, and practice of low-flow oxygen therapy and humidification.

Naiwang Tang, Haiying Li, Jiayi Zhang, Hua Ling, Linlin Shi, Huili Zhang, Qi Guo, Ronghuan Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Naiwang TangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Xuhui Central Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Haiying LiNursing Department, Shanghai Xuhui Central Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Jiayi ZhangNursing Department, Shanghai Xuhui Central Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Hua LingDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Xuhui Central Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Linlin ShiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Xuhui Central Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Huili ZhangDepartment of Infectious Disease, Shanghai Xuhui Central Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Qi GuoNursing Department, Shanghai Xuhui Central Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Ronghuan YuDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Xuhui Central Hospital, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Nurses are key in administering oxygen therapy and managing its potential adverse effects in medical settings. This study aimed to investigate the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) regarding low-flow oxygen therapy and humidification among nurses. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted from January 2024 to March 2024 at Shanghai Xuhui Central Hospital. Demographic data and KAP scores were collected through questionnaires. Result: A total of 243 valid questionnaires were collected. Among them, 228 (93.8%) were female, and 93 (38.3%) had been working for more than 10 years. The mean scores for knowledge, attitudes, and practices were 11.11 ± 4.30 (Ranging 0-18), 29.14 ± 3.41 (Ranging 7-35), and 28.07 ± 4.73 (Ranging 7-35), respectively. Multivariate logistic regression confirmed that knowledge (OR = 1.302, 95% CI: [1.167-1.453], Conclusion: Nurses demonstrated inadequate knowledge, positive attitudes, and inactive practices toward low-flow oxygen therapy and humidification. Enhanced training and increased clinical experience are recommended to improve nurses' knowledge and practice in this area.

Indexed as

attitudehumidificationknowledgelow-flow oxygen therapynursespractice

Identifiers

PMID39624038
PMCPMC11608967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.