ReviewJournal of mass spectrometry : JMS2024
Mass Spectrometry Imaging for Spatial Toxicology Research.
Review in Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comprehensive Review on the Toxicity of Five Main AQ Constituents from Rhubarb: Mechanisms, Challenges and Future Perspectives.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
The spatial information of xenobiotics distribution, metabolism, and toxicity mechanisms in situ has drawn increasing attention in both pharmaceutical and environmental toxicology research to aid drug development and environmental risk assessments. Mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) provides a label-free, multiplexed, and high-throughput tool to characterize xenobiotics, their metabolites, and endogenous molecules in situ with spatial resolution, providing knowledge on spatially resolved absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity on the molecular level. In this perspective, we briefly summarize applications of MSI in toxicology on xenobiotic distribution and metabolism, quantification, toxicity mechanisms, and biomarker discovery. We identified several challenges regarding how we can fully harness the power of MSI in both fundamental toxicology research and regulatory practices. First, how can we increase the coverage, sensitivity, and specificity in detecting xenobiotics and their metabolites in complex biological matrices? Second, how can we link the spatial molecular information of xenobiotics to toxicity consequences to understand toxicity mechanisms, predict exposure outcomes, and aid biomarker discovery? Finally, how can we standardize the MSI experiment and data analysis workflow to provide robust conclusions for regulation and drug development? With these questions in mind, we provide our perspectives on the future directions of MSI as a promising tool in spatial toxicology research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.