Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39624006›Full record

Trial reportFamily process2024

"Family Connections", a program for relatives of people with borderline personality disorder: A randomized controlled trial.

Verónica Guillén, Isabel Fernández-Felipe, José Helio Marco, Antoni Grau, Cristina Botella, Azucena García-Palacios

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Family process, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07585955 (Family Connections Transdiagnostic), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07585955 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Family Connections Transdiagnostic: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Efficacy in Relatives of People With Emotional Dysregulation

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ValenciaRan2026 to 2027Enrolled172ConditionsRelativesArmsFamily Connections Transdiagnostic for relatives of people with emotional dysregulation, Optimized Treatment as Usual (TAU-O)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Verónica GuillénDepartment of Personality, Evaluation, and Psychological Treatment, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2247-5210
Isabel Fernández-FelipeDepartment of Basic Psychology, Clinical and Psychobiology, Jaume I University, Castellón, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0995-6661
José Helio MarcoDepartment of Personality, Evaluation, and Psychological Treatment, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Antoni GrauIta Salud Mental, Barcelona, Spain.
Cristina BotellaCIBER of Physiopathology of Obesity and Nutrition, Madrid, Spain.
Azucena García-PalaciosCIBER of Physiopathology of Obesity and Nutrition, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Family members of people with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) often experience high levels of psychological symptoms such as depression, anxiety, or burden. Family Connections (FC) is a pioneer program designed for relatives of people with BPD, and it is the most empirically supported treatment thus far. The aim of this study was to carry out a randomized clinical trial to confirm the differential efficacy of FC versus an active treatment as usual (TAU) in relatives of people with BPD in a Spanish population sample. The sample consisted of 121 family members (82 family units) and a total of 82 patients who participated in a two-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT). The primary outcome was burden of illness. Secondary outcomes were depression, anxiety, stress, family empowerment, and quality of life. This is the first study to evaluate relatives and patients in an RCT design comparing two active treatment conditions of similar durations. Although no statistically significant differences were found between conditions. However, the adjusted posttest means for FC were systematically better than for TAU, and the effect sizes were larger in burden, stress, depression, family functioning, and quality of life in the FC intervention. Patients of caregivers who received the FC condition showed statistically significant improvements in stress, depression, and anxiety. Results indicated that FC helped both patients and relatives pointing to the importance of involving families of patients with severe psychological disorders.

Indexed as

Borderline Personality DisorderCaregiversDepressionQuality of LifeAdultAnxietyCost of IllnessFamilyFamily TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSpainStress, PsychologicalTreatment Outcomeborderline personality disordercaregiversfamily connectionsrelativesskills

Identifiers

PMID39624006
PMCPMC11659101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.