ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2024
Using Large Language Models to Extract Core Injury Information From Emergency Department Notes.
Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Domain-specific versus general large language models: a review and empirical benchmark in real medical texts.Scientific reports · 2026Review
- Operationalizing Large Language Models for Clinical Research Data Extraction: Methods, Quality Control, and Governance.Journal of medical systems · 2026Review
- AI powered patient records analysis for injury surveillance in children and adolescents - a feasibility study from Switzerland.International journal of public health · 2026Article
- A Large Language Model-Based Approach for Coding Information from Free-Text Reported in Fall Risk Surveillance Systems: New Opportunities for In-Hospital Risk Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Mapping artificial intelligence models in emergency medicine: A scoping review on artificial intelligence performance in emergency care and education.Turkish journal of emergency medicineReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInjuries pose a significant global health challenge due to their high incidence and mortality rates. Although injury surveillance is essential for prevention, it is resource-intensive. This study aimed to develop and validate locally deployable large language models (LLMs) to extract core injury-related information from Emergency Department (ED) clinical notes.
methodsWe conducted a diagnostic study using retrospectively collected data from January 2014 to December 2020 from two urban academic tertiary hospitals. One served as the derivation cohort and the other as the external test cohort. Adult patients presenting to the ED with injury-related complaints were included. Primary outcomes included classification accuracies for information extraction tasks related to injury mechanism, place of occurrence, activity, intent, and severity. We fine-tuned a single generalizable Llama-2 model and five distinct Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) models for each task to extract information from initial ED physician notes. The Llama-2 model was able to perform different tasks by modifying the instruction prompt. Data recorded in injury registries provided the gold standard labels. Model performance was assessed using accuracy and macro-average F1 scores.
resultsThe derivation and external test cohorts comprised 36,346 and 32,232 patients, respectively. In the derivation cohort's test set, the Llama-2 model achieved accuracies (95% confidence intervals) of 0.899 (0.889-0.909) for injury mechanism, 0.774 (0.760-0.789) for place of occurrence, 0.679 (0.665-0.694) for activity, 0.972 (0.967-0.977) for intent, and 0.935 (0.926-0.943) for severity. The Llama-2 model outperformed the BERT models in accuracy and macro-average F1 scores across all tasks in both cohorts. Imposing constraints on the Llama-2 model to avoid uncertain predictions further improved its accuracy.
conclusionLocally deployable LLMs, trained to extract core injury-related information from free-text ED clinical notes, demonstrated good performance. Generative LLMs can serve as versatile solutions for various injury-related information extraction tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.