ArticleAnnals of medicine2024
Nomograms for predicting the prognosis in multiple primary esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in Annals of medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A combined tumor burden-based nomogram for synchronous esophageal and gastric cancers: development and external validation.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDue to its rarity, it is challenging to predict the survival of patients with synchronous multiple primary esophageal squamous carcinomas (SMPESCs). We aimed to construct nomograms to predict survival outcomes and help to make therapeutic strategy for patients with SMPESCs. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe clinical and survival data of 135 patients with SMPESCs were analyzed retrospectively. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were used to identify independent prognostic factors. Nomograms were constructed to predict 1-year, 3-year and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). In addition, we further evaluated the effect of postoperative adjuvant therapy on SMPESCs patients with lymph node metastasis.
resultsIn univariate and multivariate analyses of DFS and OS, age, site of the main lesion, lymph node metastasis, total number of lymph nodes dissected, lactate dehydrogenase level and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio were identified as independent prognostic factors. These characteristics were further included to establish nomograms. For the internal validation of the nomogram predictions of survival outcomes, the concordance indices were 0.752 and 0.756, respectively. Decision curve analysis also proved the efficacy of the nomograms. Furthermore, adjuvant therapy had a statistically significant benefit for OS but not DFS in patients with lymph node metastasis.
conclusionsThese nomograms could effectively predict the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year survival outcomes of patients with SMPESCs. Furthermore, adjuvant therapy has the potential to improve OS in patients with lymph node metastasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.