Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39623753›Full record

ArticleThe Veterinary record2025

'Part of the team as opposed to watching from the outside': Critical incident study of autistic veterinary surgeons' workdays.

Kirstie Pickles, Jonathan Houdmont, Femke Smits, Bradley Hill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Veterinary record, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kirstie PicklesSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2154-3138
Jonathan HoudmontSchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5174-2619
Femke SmitsSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8560-0827
Bradley HillSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2422-9315

Funding

Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons Mind Matters Initiative Sarah Brown Mental Health Research Award
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAutistic individuals experience differences in sensory processing, communication and executive function, which may affect their experience of the workplace. We investigated UK-based autistic clinical veterinary surgeons' experiences to establish contributing factors to a good or difficult workday.

methodsPurposive sampling was used to conduct semi-structured qualitative interviews with 15 autistic veterinary surgeons. A critical incident technique was applied to explore the characteristics of a good and a difficult workday. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to identify recurrent themes and sub-themes in the narratives.

resultsFive major themes were identified as contributing to a difficult workday for autistic veterinarians: professional interactions, feeling out of control, the physical environment, role-specific challenges and self-doubt. Four overarching themes were identified as being associated with a good workday: positive interactions, feeling in control, having enough time and a sense of achievement. LIMITATIONS: As this is a qualitative study with a small number of participants, the extent to which these findings reflect the experience of the wider autistic veterinary surgeon community is unclear.

conclusionStrategies to mitigate the effect of the most cited factors leading to difficult workdays, centring around neurodiversity awareness of colleagues and control of work, are likely to be helpful to autistic veterinary surgeons.

Indexed as

Autistic DisorderInterpersonal RelationsSurgeonsSurgery, VeterinaryWorkFemaleHumansMaleOccupational StressPerceptionUnited KingdomWorkplaceautismclinical practicecritical incident studyneurodiversity awarenessveterinary surgeons

Identifiers

PMID39623753
PMCPMC11827692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.