ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2024
Machine Learning Models for Predicting 24-Hour Intraocular Pressure Changes: A Comparative Study.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Long-Term Intraocular Pressure Fluctuations in Open-Angle Glaucoma.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Multimodal-Based Non-Contact High Intraocular Pressure Detection Method.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Predicting 24-hour intraocular pressure (IOP) fluctuations is crucial for enhancing glaucoma management. Traditional methods of measuring 24-hour IOP fluctuations are complex and present certain limitations. The present study leverages machine learning techniques to forecast 24-hour IOP fluctuations based on daytime IOP measurements. MATERIAL AND METHODS A binary method was used to classify 24-hour IOP fluctuations as either >8 mmHg or £8 mmHg. Data were collected from 24-hour IOP monitoring, including 22 different features. Feature selection involved the chi-square test and point-biserial correlation, leading to the establishment of 4 subsets with significance levels of P<1, P<0.1, P<0.05, and P<0.025. Five binary classification machine learning algorithms were used to construct the model. Model performance was assessed by comparing accuracy, specificity, 10-fold cross-validation, precision, sensitivity, F1 score, area under the curve (AUC), and Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve (AUCPR). The model with the highest performance was selected, and feature importance was assessed using Shapley additive explanations. RESULTS In the subset of features where P<0.05, all models performed better than those in the other subsets, with XGBoost standing out the most. The XGBoost algorithm achieved an accuracy of 0.886, a specificity of 0.972, a 10-fold cross-validation of 0.872, a precision of 0.857, a sensitivity of 0.585, and an F1 score of 0.696. Additionally, it obtained an AUC of 0.890 and an AUCPR of 0.794. CONCLUSIONS Our study illustrates the predictive capabilities of machine learning algorithms in forecasting 24-hour IOP fluctuations. The exceptional performance of the XGBoost algorithm in predicting IOP fluctuations underscores its significance for future research and clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.