Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39623670›Full record

ReviewExpert review of molecular diagnostics2024

Diagnosis and management of invasive fungal diseases by next-generation sequencing: are we there yet?

N Esther Babady, Charles Y Chiu, Arryn Craney, David C Gaston, Rachel S Hicklen, Catherine A Hogan, Teny M John, Adam G Stewart

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert review of molecular diagnostics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. AI in fungal drug development: opportunities, challenges, and future outlook.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Review
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

N Esther BabadyClinical Microbiology Service, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Charles Y ChiuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Arryn CraneyPetrified Bugs LLC, Miami, FL, USA.
David C GastonDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Rachel S HicklenResearch Medical Library, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Catherine A HoganBritish Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Teny M JohnDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Adam G StewartCentre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Campus, Brisbane, Australia.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInvasive fungal diseases (IFDs) are a serious threat to immunocompromised patients. Routine diagnostic methods have limited performance in identifying IFDs. Next-generation sequencing (NGS), including metagenomic NGS (mNGS) and whole-genome sequencing (WGS), recently emerged as diagnostic methods that could provide more accurate and timely diagnoses and management of IFDs. AREAS COVERED: This article describes the emergence of NGS as a diagnostic tool to address the limitations of current tests. The literature regarding its application and clinical utility in the diagnosis of IFDs is reviewed. Practical considerations, challenges, and opportunities as they relate to the development and implementation of mNGS and WGS for fungal pathogens are discussed. EXPERT OPINION: NGS emerged over a decade ago with the potential to solve many of the challenges in diagnosing infectious diseases, including IFDs. However, published literature has yielded conflicting data about its clinical utility. The increased clinical adoption of NGS is improving our understanding of how to interpret and use its results to guide actionable decisions. Still, several gaps remain. As the cost, effort, and expertise involved in performing NGS decrease and the reporting of its results becomes standardized, NGS is poised to fill current gaps in the diagnosis of IFDs.

Indexed as

cancerFungal infectionsimmunocompromised patientsinvasive fungal diseasemetagenomicmolecular diagnosticsnext-generation sequencingtransplant patients

Identifiers

PMID39623670
PMCPMC12159265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.