ReviewExpert review of molecular diagnostics2024
Diagnosis and management of invasive fungal diseases by next-generation sequencing: are we there yet?
Review in Expert review of molecular diagnostics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomarkers in Invasive Pulmonary Fungal Infections: Where Do We Stand?Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- ANCA-associated vasculitis combined with coexisting Aspergillus fumigatus and Mycobacterium avium complex infections: a case report.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Antifungal treatment strategies and their impact on resistance development in clinical settings.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2025Review
- The Heterogenous Presentation of Hepatic Mucormycosis in Adults: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- AI in fungal drug development: opportunities, challenges, and future outlook.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
- Comparison of the diagnostic capabilities of tNGS and mNGS for pathogens causing lower respiratory tract infections: a prospective observational study.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionInvasive fungal diseases (IFDs) are a serious threat to immunocompromised patients. Routine diagnostic methods have limited performance in identifying IFDs. Next-generation sequencing (NGS), including metagenomic NGS (mNGS) and whole-genome sequencing (WGS), recently emerged as diagnostic methods that could provide more accurate and timely diagnoses and management of IFDs. AREAS COVERED: This article describes the emergence of NGS as a diagnostic tool to address the limitations of current tests. The literature regarding its application and clinical utility in the diagnosis of IFDs is reviewed. Practical considerations, challenges, and opportunities as they relate to the development and implementation of mNGS and WGS for fungal pathogens are discussed. EXPERT OPINION: NGS emerged over a decade ago with the potential to solve many of the challenges in diagnosing infectious diseases, including IFDs. However, published literature has yielded conflicting data about its clinical utility. The increased clinical adoption of NGS is improving our understanding of how to interpret and use its results to guide actionable decisions. Still, several gaps remain. As the cost, effort, and expertise involved in performing NGS decrease and the reporting of its results becomes standardized, NGS is poised to fill current gaps in the diagnosis of IFDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.