Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39623620›Full record

ArticleDiabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association2025

Protocol for a feasibility and acceptability study for UK general population paediatric type 1 diabetes screening-the EarLy Surveillance for Autoimmune diabetes (ELSA) study.

Lauren M Quinn, Renuka P Dias, Sheila M Greenfield, Alex G Richter, Joanna Garstang, David Shukla, Animesh Acharjee, Georgios Gkoutos, Richard Oram, Sian Faustini and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Lauren M QuinnInstitute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0500-4417
Renuka P DiasDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Sheila M GreenfieldDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Alex G RichterClinical Immunology Service, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Joanna GarstangBirmingham Community Healthcare NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.
David ShuklaDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Animesh AcharjeeInstitute of Cancer and Genomic Medicine, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Georgios GkoutosInstitute of Cancer and Genomic Medicine, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Richard OramUniversity of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3581-8980
Sian FaustiniClinical Immunology Service, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Olga BoikoDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Ian LitchfieldDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1169-5392
Felicity BoardmanWarwick Applied Health, Warwick Medical School, Warwick, UK.
Fatima ZakiaCommunity Connexions, Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Christine BurtCommunity Connexions, Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Clair ConnopINVOLVE co-applicant, Birmingham, UK.
Amanda LepleyINVOLVE co-applicant, Birmingham, UK.
Christine GardnerINVOLVE co-applicant, Birmingham, UK.
Colin DayanDivision of Infection and Immunity, School of Medicine, University of Cardiff, Cardiff, UK.
Tim BarrettInstitute of Cancer and Genomic Medicine, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Parth NarendranInstitute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4583-8793

Funding

Breakthrough T1DDiabetes UKEDENT1FI - This project is supported by the Innovative Health Initiative Joint Undertaking (IHI JU) under grant agreement No 101132379. The JU receives support from the European Union's Horizon Europe research and innovation programme, from The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust, from Breakthrough T1D, from EFPIA, from COCIR, from Vaccines Europe, from EuropaBio and from MedTech. Additional funding is provided to associated UK partners through the UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) Guarantee Fund 101132379
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe EarLy Surveillance for Autoimmune (ELSA) study aims to explore the feasibility and acceptability of UK paediatric general population screening for type 1 diabetes.

methodsWe aim to screen 20,000 children aged 3-13 years for islet-specific autoantibodies through dried blood spot sample collection at home, hospital or community settings. Children with two or more autoantibodies are offered metabolic staging via oral glucose challenge testing. Feasibility assessments will compare recruitment modalities and uptake according to demographic factors (age, gender, ethnicity, level of deprivation and family history of diabetes) to determine optimal approaches for general population screening. The study is powered to identify 60 children (0.3%) with type 1 diabetes (stage 1-3). Parents are invited to qualitative interviews following ELSA completion (child screened negative or positive, single autoantibody or multiple, stage 1-3) to share their screening experience, strengths of the programme and any areas for improvement (acceptability assessments). Parents who decline screening or withdraw from participation are invited to interview to explore any concerns. Finally, we will interview professional stakeholders delivering the ELSA study to explore barriers and facilitators to implementation.

conclusionEarly detection of type 1 diabetes allows insulin treatment to be started sooner, avoids diagnosis as an emergency, gives families time to prepare and the opportunity to benefit from future prevention trials and treatments. ELSA will provide essential feasibility and acceptability assessments for UK general population screening to inform a future national screening programme for paediatric type 1 diabetes.

Indexed as

AutoantibodiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Mass ScreeningAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolEarly DiagnosisFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMalePatient Acceptance of Health CareUnited KingdomAutoantibodiespaediatricsqualitative methodsscreeningtype 1 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID39623620
PMCPMC12006551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.