Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39623444›Full record

ArticleTrials2024

Assessing the efficacy and safety of STOP (successful treatment for paranoia)-an app-based cognitive bias modification therapy for paranoia: a randomised clinical trial protocol.

Jenny Yiend, Rayan Taher, Carolina Fialho, Chloe Hampshire, Che-Wei Hsu, Thomas Kabir, Jeroen Keppens, Philip McGuire, Elias Mouchlianitis, Emmanuelle Peters and 7 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Jenny Yiend *Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK. jenny.yiend@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1967-6292
Rayan Taher *Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Carolina FialhoInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Chloe HampshireDepartment of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Che-Wei HsuInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Thomas KabirDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Jeroen KeppensDepartment of Informatics, King's College London, London, UK.
Philip McGuireDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Elias MouchlianitisInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Emmanuelle PetersInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Tanya RicciInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Sukhwinder ShergillKent and Medway Medical School, Canterbury, Kent, UK.
Daniel StahlInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
George VamvakasInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Pamela JacobsenDepartment of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
MPIT
Avegen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParanoia, the belief that you are at risk of significant physical or emotional harm from others, is a common difficulty, which causes significant distress and impairment to daily functioning, including in psychosis-spectrum disorders. According to cognitive models of psychosis, paranoia may be partly maintained by cognitive processes, including interpretation biases. Cognitive bias modification for paranoia (CBM-pa) is an intervention targeting the bias towards interpreting ambiguous social scenarios in a way that is personally threatening. This study aims to test the efficacy and safety of a mobile app version of CBM-pa, called STOP (successful treatment of paranoia).

methodsThe STOP study is a double-blind, superiority, three-arm randomised controlled trial (RCT). People are eligible for the trial if they experience persistent, distressing paranoia, as assessed by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scales, and show evidence of an interpretation bias towards threat on standardised assessments. Participants are randomised to either STOP (two groups: 6- or 12-session dose) or text-reading control (12 sessions). Treatment as usual will continue for all participants. Sessions are completed weekly and last around 40 min. STOP is completely self-administered with no therapist assistance. STOP involves reading ambiguous social scenarios, all of which could be interpreted in a paranoid way. In each scenario, participants are prompted to consider more helpful alternatives by completing a word and answering a question. Participants are assessed at baseline, after each session, and at 6, 12, 18 and 24 weeks post-randomisation. The primary outcome is the self-reported severity of paranoid symptoms at 24 weeks, measured using the Paranoia Scale. The target sample size is 273 which is powered to detect a 15% symptom reduction on the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes are standardized measures of depression, anxiety and recovery and measures of interpretation bias. Safety is a primary outcome and measured by the Negative Effects Questionnaire and a checklist of adverse events completed fortnightly with researchers. The trial is conducted with the help of a Lived Experience Advisory Panel. DISCUSSION: This study will assess STOP's efficacy and safety. STOP has the potential to be an accessible intervention to complement other treatments for any conditions that involve significant paranoia.

trial registrationISRCTN registry, ISRCTN17754650. Registered on 03/08/2021.  https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN17754650 .

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyMobile ApplicationsParanoid DisordersRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCognitionDouble-Blind MethodEquivalence Trials as TopicHumansTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeCognitive bias modificationComputerised therapyInterpretation biasParanoiaPersecutory delusionsPsychosisRCT

Identifiers

PMID39623444
PMCPMC11610111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.