ArticleBMC nephrology2024
Association between alpha blocker use and the risk of fractures in patients with chronic kidney disease: a cohort study.
Article in BMC nephrology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Osteoporosis and Skeletal Fragility in non-Metastatic Pheochromocytomas and Paragangliomas: The Adrenergic-Skeletal Axis.Calcified tissue international · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlpha blockers (ABs) are frequently prescribed to patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), which is often complicated by refractory hypertension (HT). Although there have been several reports on the association between AB use and the risk of fractures, their conclusions have not yet been drawn. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the association between AB use and the risk of fractures in patients with CKD.
methodThis population-based cohort study used patient data obtained between April 2008 and August 2021 from a large-scale Japanese medical claims database. Consecutive patients with CKD who were newly prescribed ABs or non-AB antihypertensive drugs were included; males and females were analysed separately. The AB group was then divided into AB for HT and voiding dysfunction (VD) groups according to the drug approval in Japan. The primary outcome was the first hospitalisation due to fracture, and the variables were evaluated with weighted Cox proportional hazard model using overlap weights.
resultsA total of 65,012, 4,723, and 10,958 males constituted the non-AB, AB for HT (doxazosin), and AB for VD (naftopidil, silodosin, tamsulosin, or urapidil) groups, respectively. A total of 31,887, 2,409, and 965 females constituted the non-AB, AB for HT (doxazosin or guanabenz), and AB for VD (urapidil) groups, respectively. In males, hazard ratio (HR) for primary outcome was not increased in the non-AB and AB for VD groups compared with the AB for HT group (HR, 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38-1.28 and HR, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.67-2.66, in the non-AB and AB for VD groups, respectively). Whereas, in females, although HR for the primary outcome was not increased in the non-AB group (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.56-1.99), it was significantly increased in the AB for VD group (HR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.01-5.16) compared with the AB for HT group.
conclusionAB use in patients with CKD did not increase the risk of fractures when used for the treatment of HT; however, it increased the risk of fractures when used for the treatment of VD in females. These results suggest that ABs should be used with caution in these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.