Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39623339›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2024

Mental health professionals' beliefs and attitudes towards compulsory admission in Athens: a token of social stigma or good faith in psychiatry?-a cross-sectional study.

Lily Evangelia Peppou, Sofia Nikolaidi, Kyriaki Tsikou, Nektarios Drakonakis, Eugenie Georgaca, Aikaterini Arvaniti, Kyriakos Souliotis, Stelios Stylianidis, Vasiliki Yotsidi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lily Evangelia PeppouDepartment of Psychology, Panteion University of Social & Political Sciences, Athens, Greece. lilly.peppou@gmail.com.
Sofia NikolaidiAssociation for Regional Development & Mental Health (EPAPSY), Athens, Greece.
Kyriaki TsikouAssociation for Regional Development & Mental Health (EPAPSY), Athens, Greece.
Nektarios DrakonakisPsychiatric Hospital of Attica- Dafni, Athens, Greece.
Eugenie GeorgacaSchool of Psychology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Aikaterini ArvanitiDepartment of Psychiatry, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Kyriakos SouliotisDepartment of Social & Educational Policy, University of Peloponnese, Corinth, Greece.
Stelios StylianidisPsychiatric Hospital of Attica- Dafni, Athens, Greece.
Vasiliki YotsidiDepartment of Psychology, Panteion University of Social & Political Sciences, Athens, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMental health professionals' (MHPs) attitudes towards involuntary admissions have not received adequate attention in efforts to curb their rates. Thus, the present study set out to (i) explore MHP attitudes regarding involuntary hospitalisation, (ii) describe their perceived dangerousness of people with severe mental illness (SMI) and their trust in psychiatry, (iii) identify the predictors of attitudes towards compulsory admissions and (iv) gauge the contribution of perceived dangerousness versus trust in psychiatry to explaining them.

methodsA random sample of 300 mental health professionals working in public mental health services located in the Northern part of Athens and in the two psychiatric hospitals of Attica participated in the study. Respondents had to complete a self-reported instrument garnering information about participants' attitudes towards involuntary hospitalisation (original scale), the perceived dangerousness of people with SMI (Perceived Dangerousness Scale) and their trust in psychiatry (based on the Attitudes to Mental Illness scale) as well as various socio-demographic and work-related variables.

resultsRespondents largely accepted involuntary hospitalisations, considering them to be beneficial (72.96%) and disagreeing with the view that they adversely influence the course of illness (54.85%). Nonetheless, they believe that people with SMI should be treated in the community (89.93%), that compulsory admission should be the last therapeutic resort (84.01%) and that people with SMI should not be placed in psychiatric hospitals against their will in order to be under surveillance (90.64%). However, they acknowledge that involuntary admission is often the only treatment options(61.19%). Concomitantly, they report moderate levels of perceived dangerousness and high levels of trust in psychiatry. Trust in psychiatry had the strongest positive association with acceptance of involuntary hospitalisation among mental health professionals whereas postgraduate studies and working in outpatient settings were linked to less favourable attitudes. Interestingly, perceived dangerousness did not yield an independent effect; rather, it weakened the association between trust in psychiatry and acceptance of involuntary admissions.

conclusionsMental health professionals hold complex attitudes towards involuntary hospitalisation, which are largely explained by their trust in psychiatry. Efforts to reduce the rates of involuntary admissions should address both them and their determinants.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCommitment of Persons with Psychiatric DisordersMental DisordersSocial StigmaAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGreeceHealth PersonnelHospitals, PsychiatricHumansMaleMental Health ServicesMiddle AgedPsychiatrySurveys and QuestionnairesCoercionIatrogenic stigmaInvoluntary hospitalizationMental health staffMental health workersPrejudice

Identifiers

PMID39623339
PMCPMC11613819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.