ArticleBMC psychiatry2024
Mental health professionals' beliefs and attitudes towards compulsory admission in Athens: a token of social stigma or good faith in psychiatry?-a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessment, Intervention, Monitoring, Step-Up/Step-Down (AIMS) in Action: 5 Years Review of Transforming Transitions in Crisis Care.Psychiatric research and clinical practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMental health professionals' (MHPs) attitudes towards involuntary admissions have not received adequate attention in efforts to curb their rates. Thus, the present study set out to (i) explore MHP attitudes regarding involuntary hospitalisation, (ii) describe their perceived dangerousness of people with severe mental illness (SMI) and their trust in psychiatry, (iii) identify the predictors of attitudes towards compulsory admissions and (iv) gauge the contribution of perceived dangerousness versus trust in psychiatry to explaining them.
methodsA random sample of 300 mental health professionals working in public mental health services located in the Northern part of Athens and in the two psychiatric hospitals of Attica participated in the study. Respondents had to complete a self-reported instrument garnering information about participants' attitudes towards involuntary hospitalisation (original scale), the perceived dangerousness of people with SMI (Perceived Dangerousness Scale) and their trust in psychiatry (based on the Attitudes to Mental Illness scale) as well as various socio-demographic and work-related variables.
resultsRespondents largely accepted involuntary hospitalisations, considering them to be beneficial (72.96%) and disagreeing with the view that they adversely influence the course of illness (54.85%). Nonetheless, they believe that people with SMI should be treated in the community (89.93%), that compulsory admission should be the last therapeutic resort (84.01%) and that people with SMI should not be placed in psychiatric hospitals against their will in order to be under surveillance (90.64%). However, they acknowledge that involuntary admission is often the only treatment options(61.19%). Concomitantly, they report moderate levels of perceived dangerousness and high levels of trust in psychiatry. Trust in psychiatry had the strongest positive association with acceptance of involuntary hospitalisation among mental health professionals whereas postgraduate studies and working in outpatient settings were linked to less favourable attitudes. Interestingly, perceived dangerousness did not yield an independent effect; rather, it weakened the association between trust in psychiatry and acceptance of involuntary admissions.
conclusionsMental health professionals hold complex attitudes towards involuntary hospitalisation, which are largely explained by their trust in psychiatry. Efforts to reduce the rates of involuntary admissions should address both them and their determinants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.