SynthesisBMC infectious diseases2024
The association between mortality due to COVID-19 and coagulative parameters: a systematic review and meta-analysis study.
Synthesis in BMC infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dysregulated metabolic homeostasis as a unifying death mechanism underlying the diverse clinical manifestations of COVID-19: insights from a retrospective analysis of sequential blood variables.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Optimizing Clinical Management of COVID-19: A Predictive Model for Unvaccinated Patients Admitted to ICU.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Complex Pattern of Platelet Activation/Reactivity After SARS-CoV-2 Infection.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
AIMS AND
objectivesThis systematic review and meta-analysis study evaluated the association between mortality due to COVID-19 and coagulative factors.
methodsA systematic search was conducted on electronic databases including PubMed, Scopus, and the Web of Science from the beginning of the pandemic until October 2024 to identify relevant studies on COVID-19 patients and their laboratory findings related to coagulation markers and mortality outcome. Eligibility criteria were defined based on the PICO framework, and data extraction was performed by two authors independently using a standardized sheet. Statistical analysis was accomplished using the random effects model, and heterogeneity among studies was assessed using the I
resultsOur systematic literature search yielded 6969 studies, with 48 studies meeting the inclusion criteria for our meta-analysis. The mean platelet count was significantly lower in deceased COVID-19 patients compared to survivors (20.58), while activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and fibrinogen levels did not show significant differences. The pooled mean difference of D-Dimer, International Normalized Ratio (INR), and prothrombin time (PT) were significantly lower in survived patients (-2.45, -0.10, and -0.84, respectively). These findings suggest that platelet count, D-Dimer, INR, and PT may serve as potential indicators of mortality in COVID-19 patients.
conclusionThe results of our systematic review and meta-analysis revealed a significant reduction in the pooled platelet count among deceased individuals when compared to survivors. However, no significant distinctions were observed in the pooled mean activated aPTT and fibrinogen levels between the deceased and survivor groups. On the other hand, there were noticeable variations in the pooled estimated mean of INR, PT, and D-Dimer levels, with significantly higher values in the deceased group compared to those who survived.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.