ArticleInternational journal of emergency medicine2024
Automatic B-lines: a tool for minimizing time to diuretic administration in pulmonary edema patients in the emergency department of a developing country.
Article in International journal of emergency medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lung ultrasound B-lines predict adverse clinical outcomes in adults with sepsis in a resource-limited emergency department.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Agreement between carotid and LVOT non-invasive cardiac output measurements in ED septic shock patients: a prospective observational study.Scientific reports · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEffective management of pulmonary edema in the emergency department (ED) is crucial given its significant global impact on health. This study aimed to investigate the hypothesis: "Does the utilization of Automatic B-lines via ultrasonography in patients with pulmonary edema facilitate faster diuretic administration in a developing country?"
methodsThis retrospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary academic center in Thailand. Patients with pulmonary edema admitted to the ED between January 2023 and June 2024 were enrolled. Ultrasound documentation and electronic ED medical records were compared to assess the time of diuretic administration between patients who had lung ultrasounds utilizing automatic B-lines and those who had manual B-lines counted by physician eye inspection. Multivariate logistic regression was employed to examine the relationship between the use of automatic B-lines and early diuretic administration.
resultsThe study included 134 patients with pulmonary edema. The time to diuretic administration was significantly shorter in the automatic B-lines group (median time [Q1-Q3], 55 min; range, 35-110 min) compared to the non-automatic B-lines group (median time, 100 min; range, 75-145 min). In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, early diuretic administration within 60 min of triage was significantly more likely in the automatic B-lines group (adjusted odds ratio, 1.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-2.45) than in the non-automatic B-lines group.
conclusionsIn a developing country, patients with pulmonary edema who had lung ultrasound evaluation with automated B lines experienced a fastest diuresis compared to those who utilized ultrasonography without automatic B lines. Implementing automatic B-lines as an early screening protocol could enhance clinical practice in the ED.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.