Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39623273›Full record

ArticleNan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University2024

[

J Qiu, Y Qiu, G Li, L Zhang, X Zheng, Y Yao, X Wang, H Huang, F Zhang, J Su and 2 more

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

J QiuSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Y QiuSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510006, China.
G LiSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510006, China.
L ZhangSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510006, China.
X ZhengSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Y YaoSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510006, China.
X WangDongguan Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Dongguan 523000, China.
H HuangDongguan Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Dongguan 523000, China.
F ZhangDongguan Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Dongguan 523000, China.
J SuFoshan Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Foshan 528000, China.
X ZhengSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510006, China.
X HuangSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510006, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the therapeutic effect of

methodsMale Balb/c mice were randomly divided into normal control group, model group, mesalazine group (5-ASA, 200 mg/kg), and low-, medium-and high-dose HQD groups (2.275, 4.55 and 9.1 g/kg, respectively). With the exception of those in the normal control group, all the mice were exposed to 3% DSS solution in drinking water for 7 days to establish UC models. After treatment with the indicated drugs, the mice were assessed for colon injury and apoptosis using HE, AB-PAS and TUNEL staining, and the expression levels of inflammatory factors were detected with ELISA. Western blotting, immunohistochemistry and qRT-PCR were used to detect the changes in protein expressions associated with the intestinal chemical barrier, mechanical barrier and endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS).

resultsHQD treatment significantly reduced DAI score and macro score of UC mice, decreased colonic epithelial cell apoptosis, lowered expressions of IL-6, TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-8, and enhanced the expressions of MUC2 and TFF3. HQD treatment also upregulated the protein expressions of claudin-1, occludin and E-cadherin, reduced the expressions of GRP78, CHOP, caspase-12 and caspase-3, decreased the phosphorylation levels of PERK, eIF2α and IRE1α, and increased the Bcl-2/Bax ratio in the colon tissues of UC mice.

conclusionHQD inhibits colonic epithelial cell apoptosis and improves intestinal barrier function in UC mice possibly by reducing ERS mediated by the PERK and IRE1α signaling pathways.

Indexed as

ApoptosisColitis, UlcerativeDrugs, Chinese HerbalEndoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone BiPEndoplasmic Reticulum StressMice, Inbred BALB CAnimalsColonDisease Models, AnimaleIF-2 KinaseEndoribonucleasesInterleukin-6Interleukin-8Intestinal MucosaMaleMiceDrugs, Chinese HerbaleIF-2 KinaseEndoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone BiPEndoribonucleasesHspa5 protein, mouseInterleukin-6Interleukin-8OccludinProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesTranscription Factor CHOPTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaapoptosisendoplasmic reticulum stressHuangqin Decoctionulcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID39623273
PMCPMC11605200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.