ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2025
Efficacy of a 1064-nm Picosecond Laser for Treating Early-Stage Traumatic and Surgical Scars.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe role of fractional picosecond-domain lasers in scar remodeling is being increasingly recognized. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a fractional 1064-nm neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) picosecond laser for treating early-stage traumatic and surgical scars in an Asian population.
methodsThirty-seven patients with 49 early-stage traumatic and surgical scar lesions were enrolled. Participants underwent three treatment sessions with a fractional 1064-nm Nd:YAG picosecond laser at 4-8-week intervals. Two non-involved dermatologists evaluated the treatment response using the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) and Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS).
resultsAfter treatment, the early-stage traumatic and surgical scars significantly improved. The treatment effects differed markedly according to the number of treatment sessions (F=219.71, P<0.001). The VSS scores were 5.56 ± 2.17 and 3.85 ± 2.02 in the postoperative period after one (P<0.001) and three (P<0.001) sessions, respectively, compared with the baseline VSS score (6.94 ± 1.85). After three treatment sessions, 69.39% of the scars improved based on the GAIS scores. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by the small number of participants involved and the lack of a control group.
conclusionThe fractionated 1064-nm Nd:YAG picosecond laser effectively treated early-stage traumatic and surgical scars in an Asian population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
39623232What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.