ArticleSpine deformity2025
Comparison of postoperative and outpatient opioid use in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients treated with posterior spinal fusion surgery and vertebral body tethering.
Article in Spine deformity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Anterior Vertebral Body Tethering Versus Posterior Spinal Fusion in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSurgical treatments for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) include posterior spinal fusion (PSF) and vertebral body tethering (VBT), but there is limited data that compares pain between these groups. We aimed to compare postoperative pain between these patients through inpatient opioid use and opioid prescriptions post-discharge.
methodsA retrospective review of patients diagnosed with AIS who underwent PSF or VBT surgery was reviewed to determine LOS, inpatient opioid use, and opioids prescribed post-discharge. Only PSF patients who received liposomal bupivacaine and intrathecal (IT) hydromorphone, and VBT patients who received a paravertebral catheter of lidocaine and in addition to IT hydromorphone were included. Opioid amounts were reported as oral morphine equivalents (OMEs).
resultsOf 198 AIS patients that met inclusion, there were 89 PSF and 109 VBT patients. PSF patients had an increased LOS by 0.6 days compared to VBT patients (p < 0.001). Patients in the PSF group were administered a mean of 30.0 OMEs/day compared with the VBT group who received 12.5 OMEs/day (p < 0.001). At discharge, PSF patients were initially prescribed a mean of 227.7 OMEs while VBT patients' mean prescription was 139.7 (p < 0.001). PSF patients received more refills (Χ
conclusionIn AIS patients undergoing surgical correction, those who underwent PSF had longer LOS, received more inpatient OMEs, and were prescribed more OMEs both at initial discharge and total as an outpatient, when compared to VBT patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III: (retrospective cohort study).
Indexed as
Identifiers
39623198What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.