ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025
Patient reported outcomes and decision regret scores in redo-paraesophageal hernia repair.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRecurrent paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repair presents significant technical challenges, with limited data weighing the benefit to the operative risk. This study aims to describe our experience with recurrent PEH repair, including long-term surgical and patient reported outcomes (PROs).
methodsWe conducted a retrospective review of recurrent PEH repairs from June 2018-March 2023 using our institutional database. A blinded review of post-operative imaging was conducted to assess for recurrence. Quality of life (QOL) and decision regret were measured using the GERD Health-Related Quality-of-Life (GERD-HRQL) questionnaire and Decision Regret Scale (DRS) at maximum follow up.
resultsEighty-eight patients underwent recurrent PEH repair at our institution for PEH, classified as type II (13.6%), type III (72.7%) and type IV (13.6%). There was significant heterogeneity in operative techniques used: one-third of patients had mesh placed at the hiatus, 11.4% had a Collis gastroplasty, and one-third of patients underwent fundoplication. Intraoperative complications included gastric (5.7%), esophageal (2.3%), vascular (1.1%) and pulmonary (1.1%) injuries. Follow up was available for 73 patients with median follow up of 35.2 months. Of patients with radiographic follow up, 20 (35.7%) had a radiographic recurrence: 12 (21.4%) were 2-5 cm and 8 (14.3%) were > 5 cm. Patients reporting PROs (53 patients; 60.2%) reported low symptom severity (mean GERD-HRQL 13.1 ± 12) and low decision regret (mean DRS 13.3 ± 19.4) with 75.5% scoring in the lowest quartile (DRS < 25). Radiographic recurrence was associated with worse QOL (p < 0.05), but no significant difference in decision regret (p = 0.125).
conclusionWe found significant heterogeneity amongst recurrent PEH repair techniques with continued high recurrence rate during follow up. Radiographic recurrence was correlated with worse QOL, yet patients reported low symptom severity and low decision regret, suggesting continued value in these challenging operations. Future studies should aim to identify more effective techniques to reduce recurrence rates in this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39623178What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.