ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025
Teaching residents in emergency surgery for acute bowel obstruction-is supervised surgery safe and feasible? A retrospective single-center analysis from a MIS-specialized hospital.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveEmergency surgery for acute bowel obstruction (ABO) is a common and occasionally technically demanding procedure, requiring both surgical skill and strategic planning. The risk entailed in teaching residents during ABO surgery has not been defined or investigated in detail to date. It is the aim of this study to reveal whether surgery for ABO, performed by resident surgeons under supervision, is safe and feasible.
designA retrospective analysis was conducted of all emergency surgeries for ABO performed between 2009 and 2023 at a community-based hospital. Patients' general characteristics, procedural data and outcome parameters were compared. Differences between teaching procedures and non-teaching procedures were analysed.
settingThe study was conducted at the Department of General and Visceral surgery at a community-based hospital (St. John of God Hospital Salzburg, Austria).
participantsAll emergency surgeries for ABO (n = 300 patients) that were performed during the study period were included.
resultsEmergency surgery for ABO was performed in 300 patients during the study period, 15.3% of which operations were performed by residents under supervision and 84.7% by senior surgeons. No differences between these two groups were found in terms of patient characteristics, except for a past medical history of previous gynecologic or urologic surgery that was more frequent in the senior surgeon group (p = 0.02). Neither procedural data nor conversion rates from a minimally invasive (MIS) to an open (OS) approach, nor postoperative complication rates were found to be significantly different between these groups.
conclusionEmergency surgery for ABO, performed by residents under supervision, is safe and feasible, showing no significant differences in terms of complication rates, morbidity or mortality as compared to procedures performed by senior surgeons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.