In one paragraphArticle in Parasitology research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from itWhat it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
12 authors.
Carmen Arias-PachecoParasitic Diseases and Zoonoses Laboratory (LabEPar), Department of Pathology, Reproduction and One Health (DPRSU), School of Agrarian and Veterinarian Sciences (FCAV), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6720-4524 Patricia Parreira PerinParasitic Diseases and Zoonoses Laboratory (LabEPar), Department of Pathology, Reproduction and One Health (DPRSU), School of Agrarian and Veterinarian Sciences (FCAV), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3896-7554 Wilson Junior OliveiraParasitic Diseases and Zoonoses Laboratory (LabEPar), Department of Pathology, Reproduction and One Health (DPRSU), School of Agrarian and Veterinarian Sciences (FCAV), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2843-9843 Andressa de Souza PolloParasitic Diseases and Zoonoses Laboratory (LabEPar), Department of Pathology, Reproduction and One Health (DPRSU), School of Agrarian and Veterinarian Sciences (FCAV), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1834-8887 Danise BenattiParasitic Diseases and Zoonoses Laboratory (LabEPar), Department of Pathology, Reproduction and One Health (DPRSU), School of Agrarian and Veterinarian Sciences (FCAV), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8552-0926 Talita Oliveira MendonçaParasitic Diseases and Zoonoses Laboratory (LabEPar), Department of Pathology, Reproduction and One Health (DPRSU), School of Agrarian and Veterinarian Sciences (FCAV), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6739-7071 Lívia de Oliveira AndradeParasitic Diseases and Zoonoses Laboratory (LabEPar), Department of Pathology, Reproduction and One Health (DPRSU), School of Agrarian and Veterinarian Sciences (FCAV), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8820-2624 Jonathan Silvestre GomesParasitic Diseases and Zoonoses Laboratory (LabEPar), Department of Pathology, Reproduction and One Health (DPRSU), School of Agrarian and Veterinarian Sciences (FCAV), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-9295-3641 Natália de Oliveira ZollaParasitic Diseases and Zoonoses Laboratory (LabEPar), Department of Pathology, Reproduction and One Health (DPRSU), School of Agrarian and Veterinarian Sciences (FCAV), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7059-4815 Adrian Felipe de Moraes FerreiraParasitic Diseases and Zoonoses Laboratory (LabEPar), Department of Pathology, Reproduction and One Health (DPRSU), School of Agrarian and Veterinarian Sciences (FCAV), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3653-3242 Vitória Maximiana Soares Dos SantosParasitic Diseases and Zoonoses Laboratory (LabEPar), Department of Pathology, Reproduction and One Health (DPRSU), School of Agrarian and Veterinarian Sciences (FCAV), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3581-2060 Estevam G Lux HoppeParasitic Diseases and Zoonoses Laboratory (LabEPar), Department of Pathology, Reproduction and One Health (DPRSU), School of Agrarian and Veterinarian Sciences (FCAV), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil. lux.hoppe@unesp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3958-7227 Funding
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 407965/2021-1Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 001
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
Invasive alien species have the potential to introduce pathogens of economic and health importance in new environments. In Brazil, parasites from the non-native European brown hare can be a threat to humans, domestic animals, and wildlife. Therefore, we aimed to describe the helminth fauna of the invasive European brown hare in three Brazilian states (São Paulo, Paraná, and Rio Grande do Sul). For this, 90 brown hares were collected and examined for helminths. Helminth specimens recovered were morphologically identified and genetically characterized based on the DNA of male specimens using three genetic regions (28S rDNA, ITS-2, and cox-1 mtDNA). Descriptors of infection were calculated, and statistical analysis was performed. Parasites were found only in the small intestine of 14.4% (13/90) of brown hares and low parasite loads per animal were recorded (range = 1-530). The obtained specimens were morphologically identified as Trichostrongylus colubriformis and Bunostomum trigonocephalum. There was a high level of agreement between phylogenetic analysis and morphology for T. colubriformis. The geographical region was the only significant factor for infection; the State of Rio Grande do Sul had a higher general prevalence, higher T. colubriformis specific prevalence, and higher mean abundance than the other states evaluated. All hares were in a good body condition. To our knowledge, this is a new host record for B. trigonocephalum. This is the first study on the helminthological diversity of European brown hares in Brazil, and our results indicate that their helminth fauna is represented by parasites of domestic ruminants with zoonotic potential.
Indexed as
HaresHelminthiasis, AnimalAnimalsBrazilDNA, HelminthHelminthsIntroduced SpeciesMalePhylogenyDNA, HelminthBunostomum trigonocephalumInvasive speciesParasite-host relationshipPhylogenyTrichostrongylus colubriformis
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390