ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2025
Getting the right combination to break the epigenetic code.
Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metabolically and epigenetically reprogrammed splenic TRNP1Nature genetics · 2026Article
- Breast Cancer: Epidemiology, Molecular Classification, Diagnostics and Evolving Treatment Paradigms.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Epigenetic modifications in cancer drug resistance: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic interventions.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Article
- Epigenetics of Malignant Melanoma: Mechanisms, Diagnostic Approaches and Therapeutic Applications.Oncology research · 2026Review
- Multidimensional tumor heterogeneity and its role in therapeutic resistance.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Epigenetics: the master switch of nasopharyngeal carcinoma invasion and metastasis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Epigenetic modifications of immune cells in rheumatoid arthritis.Annals of medicine · 2025Review
- Epigenetic Changes Associated With Obesity-related Metabolic Comorbidities.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rapid advances in the field of epigenetics have facilitated the development of novel therapeutics targeting epigenetic mechanisms that are hijacked by cancer cells to support tumour growth and progression. Several epigenetic agents have been approved by the FDA for the treatment of cancer; however, the efficacy of these drugs is dependent on the underlying biology and drivers of the disease, with inherent differences between solid tumours and haematological malignancies. The efficacy of epigenetic drugs as single agents remains limited across most cancer types, which has spurred the clinical development of combination therapies, with the hope of attaining synergistic activity and/or overcoming treatment resistance. In this Review we discuss clinical advances that have been achieved with the use of epigenetic agents in combination with chemotherapies, immunotherapies or other targeted agents, including epigenetic-epigenetic combinations, as well as limitations and challenges associated with these combinatorial strategies. So far, the success of combination therapies targeting epigenetic mechanisms has generally been confined to haematological malignancies, with limited efficacy observed in patients with solid tumours. Nevertheless, this Review captures the field of epigenetic combination therapies across the spectra of haematology and oncology, highlighting opportunities for precision therapy to effectively harness the potential of epigenetic agents and produce meaningful improvements in clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39623073What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.