ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2024
Co-design of an electronic patient-reported outcome symptom monitoring system for immunotherapy toxicities.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Co-research in the development of AI and digital health tools for cancer management and care: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2026Pooled it
- Patient-reported outcomes in Australian oncology: from emerging practice to system-wide care.Internal medicine journal · 2026Article
- Usability and Acceptance Testing of an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Symptom Monitoring System for People Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- The immune-related symptom web in immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: a longitudinal clinical safety surveillance framework for immune-related adverse events.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Toward nursing-integrated biomarker surveillance for immune-related adverse events during immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Development of an electronic system for self/proxy symptom tracking alongside children with cancer and their caregivers: a co-design exemplar.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Article
- Mapping immune checkpoint inhibitor side effects to item libraries for use in real-time side effect monitoring systems.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUtilising electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePRO) to monitor symptoms can improve patient outcomes. However, ePRO systems are typically not co-designed with end-users which may limit their utility and long-term sustainability. We aimed to co-design a real-time ePRO symptom monitoring system for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) toxicities.
methodsWe conducted three co-design workshops at an Australian quaternary cancer centre. Participants were patients who had received/were receiving ICI or their caregivers, managing clinicians, administration staff, and electronic medical record (EMR) analysts. Workshop 1 identified preferences for an ideal ePRO system, informing the development of a prototype and generic workflow. Workshop 2 sought feedback on the prototype and workflow. Workshop 3 reviewed the updated prototype and adapted the generic workflow to create a site-specific workflow. Workshop transcripts were analysed thematically.
resultsTwenty-seven participants were included. Themes relating to system content and functionality included the need for customisation according to anticipated ICI toxicities; maximising patient accessibility, comprehension, and usability; providing ICI-specific self-management advice; and maximising clinician interpretability and usability. Themes relating to the model of care included the importance of maintaining the "human element" within the ePRO system, providing 24-hour support, alignment with existing clinical workflows, and automation of symptom monitoring processes using the EMR.
conclusionEarly, broad stakeholder engagement through co-design may improve the relevance, uptake, and sustainability of ePRO systems. Future work will involve usability and acceptance testing of the prototype, followed by implementation into routine care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39623054What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.