ArticleScientific reports2024
Role of scalp arteries in revascularization after side to side anastomosis in moyamoya disease patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Side-to-Side versus Traditional End-to-Side Approach to STA-MCA Bypass in Moyamoya Disease: A Comparative Meta-analysis.Journal of neurological surgery reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In our recent study, we introduced a novel side-to-side (S-S) bypass technique for adult moyamoya disease (MMD) patients. We aimed to validate the potential of this technique in enhancing postoperative revascularization. Patients undergoing S-S or end-to-side (E-S) bypass were enrolled, clinical data and angiography parameters were collected and compared. We included 44 E-S and 40 S-S MMD patients. There were no significant differences in basic characteristics and postoperative Matsushima grades between the two groups. However, in the S-S group, fewer patients had Matsushima grade D (0%) compared to the E-S group (11.4%, P = 0.028). The S-S group showed a greater occipital artery (OA) participation in revascularization (87.5% vs. 56.8%, P = 0.002) and higher postoperative caliber change ratio (CCR) of the superficial temporal artery (STA)-frontal branch (1.26 ± 0.43 vs. 1.04 ± 0.53, P = 0.038) compared to the E-S group. This difference was more pronounced in the subgroup with poor revascularization outcomes: in the S-S group, the CCR of the STA-frontal branch and the degree of participation in revascularization were 1.163 ± 0.168 and 58.8%, respectively, while in the E-S group, they were only 0.798 ± 0.494 and 6.7%. The S-S group also had a higher OA CCR (1.133 ± 0.257) and participation (82.4%) compared to the E-S group (0.941 ± 0.216 and 37.5%, respectively). In conclusion, the S-S bypass technique effectively utilizes scalp arteries, particularly the STA-frontal branch and OA, for direct revascularization via the preserved distal STA in adult MMD patients. Scalp arteries can serve as a supplementary source of donor arteries, especially beneficial for patients with suboptimal revascularization outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.