ArticleScientific reports2024
Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting survival in gastric signet ring cell carcinoma patients treated with radiotherapy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immune, molecular and genetic profiles of gastric signet ring cell carcinoma: Recent progress and future challenges.International journal of cancer · 2026Review
- Development and validation of nomograms for predicting overall survival and cancer-specific survival in female gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma: a SEER database analysis.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Analysis of clinicopathological features, treatment modalities, and survival outcomes in advanced gastric and colorectal signet ring cell carcinoma.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Prognosis Prediction and Surgical Benefit Subgroup Analysis in Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients Undergoing Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is no effective clinical prediction model to predict the prognosis of gastric signet ring cell carcinoma (GSRC) patients treated with radiotherapy. This study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 20-80-year-old patients diagnosed with GSRC between 2004 and 2019 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Using Cox regression analyses revealed independent prognostic factors, and a nomogram was constructed. The C-index, net reclassification index (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) of the nomogram were greater than those of the TNM staging system for predicting OS, indicating that the nomogram predicted prognosis with greater accuracy. The area under the curve (AUC) values were 0.725, 0.753 and 0.745 for the training group; 0.725, 0.763 and 0.752 for the internal validation group; and 0.795, 0.764 and 0.765 for the external validation group, respectively. Calibration plots demonstrated high agreement between the nomogram's prediction and the actual observations. The risk stratification system was able to accurately stratify patients who underwent radiotherapy for GSRC into high- and low-risk subgroups, with significant differences in prognosis. The Kaplan‒Meier survival analysis according to different treatments indicated that surgery combined with chemoradiotherapy is a more effective treatment strategy for improving OS in for GSRC patients. The nomogram is sufficiently accurate to predict the prognostic factors of GSRC receiving radiotherapy, allowing for clinicians to predict the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.