ArticleScientific reports2024
Research on prediction of high energy microseismic events in rock burst mines based on BP neural network.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In response to the frequent occurrence of high-energy microseismic events in coal mines in China, a back propagation neural network (BPNN) prediction model based on surface subsidence data has been proposed to provide a basis for safely and efficiently predicting coal mine disasters. Theoretical research on the relationship between surface displacement, mining disturbance, and high-energy microseismic event levels has demonstrated a significant correlation among these factors. When there is a sudden increase or decrease in surface displacement or mining disturbance, the advancing working face typically exhibits dynamic characteristics. Therefore, feature parameters relevant to predicting high-energy microseismic event levels were selected as input variables for the BPNN model. Raw data from 88 sets of microseismic events in the 301 working face of the third mining area of a certain coal mine in Inner Mongolia were extracted. First, outlier preprocessing was conducted to obtain a complete dataset, which is then divided into a training set and a testing set. The BPNN model was trained with the training set and subsequently tested to evaluate its predictive performance. Finally, by comparing several model evaluation metrics, it was found that the BPNN model outperforms other common models in predicting high-energy events. The overall prediction accuracy is 86.4%, and the root mean square error (RMSE) is 0.45, indicating that the BPNN-based prediction model for high-energy microseismic events in coal mines is feasible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.