Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39622931›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Photon-counting in dual-contrast-enhanced computed tomography: a proof-of-concept quantitative biomechanical assessment of articular cartilage.

Petri Paakkari, Satu I Inkinen, Ali Mohammadi, Miika T Nieminen, Anisha Joenathan, Mark W Grinstaff, Juha Töyräs, Janne T A Mäkelä, Juuso T J Honkanen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Petri PaakkariDepartment of Technical Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland. petri.paakkari@uef.fi.ORCID 0000-0002-1388-0997
Satu I InkinenHUS Diagnostic Center, Radiology, Helsinki University and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Ali MohammadiDepartment of Technical Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Miika T NieminenResearch Unit of Health Sciences and Technology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Anisha JoenathanDepartments of Biomedical Engineering, Chemistry and Medicine, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Mark W GrinstaffDepartments of Biomedical Engineering, Chemistry and Medicine, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Juha TöyräsDepartment of Technical Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Janne T A MäkeläDepartment of Technical Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Juuso T J HonkanenRadiotherapy Department, Center of Oncology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.

Funding

Competitive State Research Funding of the Kuopio University Catchment Area 5654199Competitive State Research Funding of the Kuopio University Hospital Catchment Area 5063579The Research Council of Finland 307932The Research Council of Finland 316899The Research Council of Finland 348410The Research Council of Finland 357787
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This proof-of-concept study explores quantitative imaging of articular cartilage using photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) with a dual-contrast agent approach, comparing it to clinical dual-energy CT (DECT). The diffusion of cationic iodinated CA4 + and non-ionic gadolinium-based gadoteridol contrast agents into ex vivo bovine medial tibial plateau cartilage was tracked over 72 h. Continuous maps of the contrast agents' diffusion were created, and correlations with biomechanical indentation parameters (equilibrium and instantaneous moduli, and relaxation time constants) were examined at 28 specific locations. Cartilage at each location was analyzed as full-thickness to ensure a fair comparison, and calibration-based material decomposition was employed for concentration estimation. Both DECT and PCD-CT exhibit strong correlations between CA4 + content and biomechanical parameters, with PCD-CT showing superior significance, especially at later time points. DECT lacks significant correlations with gadoteridol-related parameters, while PCD-CT identifies noteworthy correlations between gadoteridol diffusion and biomechanical parameters. In summary, the experimental PCD-CT setup demonstrates superior accuracy and sensitivity in concentration estimation, suggesting its potential as a more effective tool for quantitatively assessing articular cartilage condition compared to a conventional clinical DECT scanner.

Indexed as

Cartilage, ArticularContrast MediaGadoliniumPhotonsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCattleHeterocyclic CompoundsOrganometallic CompoundsProof of Concept StudyContrast MediaGadoliniumgadoteridolHeterocyclic CompoundsOrganometallic CompoundsArticular cartilageBiomechanical indentationContrast-enhanced computed tomographyDual-energy computed tomographyOsteoarthritisPhoton-counting detector

Identifiers

PMID39622931
PMCPMC11612382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.