ArticleScientific reports2024
Solvent extraction of Ac-225 in nano-layer coated, solvent resistant PDMS microfluidic chips.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Using dimensionless numbers to understand interfacial mass transfer for parallel flow in a microchannel.Microfluidics and nanofluidics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Separating medical radionuclides from their targets is one of the most critical steps in radiopharmaceutical production. Among many separation methods, solvent extraction has a lot of potential due to its simplicity, high selectivity, and high efficiency. Especially with the rise of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) microfluidic chips, this extraction process can take place in a simple and reproducible chip platform continuously and automatically. Furthermore, the microfluidic chips can be coated with metal-oxide nano-layers, increasing their resistance against the employed organic solvents. We fabricated such chips and demonstrated a parallel flow at a considerably large range of flow rates using the aqueous and organic solutions commonly used in medical radionuclide extraction. In our following case study for the separation of Ac-225 from radium with the chelator di(2-ethylhexyl)phosphoric acid (D2EHPA), a remarkable extraction efficiency of 97.1 % ± 1.5 % was reached within 1.8 seconds of contact time, while maintaining a near perfect phase separation of the aqueous and organic solutions. This method has the potential to enable automation of solvent extraction and faster target recycling, and serves, therefore, as a proof-of-concept for the applicability of microfluidic chip solvent extraction of (medical) radionuclides.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.