Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39622882›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Correlation reconstruction mechanism based on dual wavelength imaging and neural network.

Hualong Ye, Daidou Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hualong YeSchool of Electrical and Information Engineering, Changshu Institute of Technology, Changshu, 215500, China.
Daidou GuoUniversity of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200093, China. 2367272689@qq.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a natural light-field imaging scene, lighting is usually performed using a mixed light field of multiple wavelengths. To better meet the requirements of human vision, this study proposes a correlation reconstruction method based on dual-wavelength imaging and a neural network (compression sensing correlation fusion-reconstruction by dual-wavelength imaging and auto-encoder neural network, CSCFR-DWI-AENN). Two different wavelengths of light are mixed through an optical multiplexer unit (OMU) to form a dual-wavelength illumination light field, and the light intensity value reflected by the object is received by the detector. The object information was reconstructed using the compressed sensing ghost imaging algorithm, and the distribution of the illumination field was taken as prior information. Two single-wavelength illumination information and the detection value are used for compressed sensing reconstruction, and the high-quality reconstructed image of the target to be measured is obtained by combining the noise reduction advantage of the autoencoder neural network. Then the target information is fused by the New Sum of Modified Laplacian (NSML) algorithm. Two single-wavelength reconstruction, dual-wavelength direct reconstruction and the proposed reconstruction were compared respectively, and non-reference image quality evaluation functions such as EN, MI, EAV and SF were used to process and analyze the reconstruction effect. It is proved that this algorithm can reconstruct the object image comprehensively, reproduce the complete detail information, and achieve a more accurate, more comprehensive and more reliable description of the same object. It provides a theoretical basis for multi-wavelength imaging technology and has a good application prospect.

Indexed as

Autoencoder neural networkCompressed sensingDual-wavelength imagingFusion reconstructionGhost imaging

Identifiers

PMID39622882
PMCPMC11612175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.