Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39622848›Full record

ArticleNPJ vaccines2024

Modeling the persistence of 4CMenB vaccine protection against real world meningococcal B disease in adolescents.

Lorenzo Argante, Ottavia Prunas, Duccio Medini, Ellen Ypma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ vaccines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lorenzo ArganteGSK, Siena, Italy. lorenzo.x.argante@gsk.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6853-068X
Ottavia PrunasGSK, Siena, Italy.
Duccio MediniGSK, Siena, Italy.
Ellen YpmaGSK, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The efficacy of the four-component 4CMenB vaccine is measured through the serum bactericidal antibody (SBA) assay on four meningococcal B (MenB) indicator strains. However, they are not epidemiologically relevant for disease, thus the real-world persistence of 4CMenB protection remains uncertain. Several mathematical models of waning immunity were fitted on longitudinal SBA data from persistence studies in adolescents, with up to eight years follow-up after 4CMenB priming vaccination. The best model was used to predict protection from indicator strains. MenB typing data from the United States were used to integrate antigen-level curves and predict the persistence of protection from real-world MenB strains, considering synergies between antigens. Models show that protection and its evolution varied by antigen and that 4CMenB likely elicits antibody-producing long-lived plasma cells. 4CMenB protection from real-world MenB disease persisted at 61.5% four years post-priming and 70.5% four years post-booster. This evidence could support decision-making on adolescent immunization programs.

Identifiers

PMID39622848
PMCPMC11612355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.