ArticleChemSusChem2025
Upcycling Textile Waste into Anionic and Cationic Cellulose Nanofibrils and Their Assembly into 2D and 3D Materials.
Article in ChemSusChem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Aging transforms marine microplastics into reactive interfaces with environmental consequences.iScience · 2026Review
- Concomitant Removal of Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Humic Acid from Water Using a Cationic Cellulose Nanofiber.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Progress and future outlook towards a safe and sustainable production and use of chemicals.Communications chemistry · 2025Review
- Automated thermal desorption-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry for screening of hazardous chemicals in cotton and cotton blend garments-analytical challenges.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Upcycling Textile Waste into Anionic and Cationic Cellulose Nanofibrils and Their Assembly into 2D and 3D Materials.ChemSusChem · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Extracting high-performance nanomaterials from waste presents a promising avenue for valorization. This study presents two methods for extracting cellulose nanofibrils (CNFs) from discarded textiles. Post-consumer cotton fabrics are chemically treated through either cationization with (2,3-epoxypropyl)trimethylammonium chloride or TEMPO/NaBr-catalyzed oxidation, followed by fibrillation to produce Cat-CNFs and TO-CNFs, respectively. Molecular models indicate variations in the effective volume of each grafted group, influencing the true densities of the functionalized fibers. Significant differences in the morphology of the CNFs arise from each functionalization route. Both CNF types exhibit high surface charge (>0.9 mmol g
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.