Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39622764›Full record

ReviewZhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi2024

[The mechanisms and salvage treatment strategies underlying positive relapse following CD19 CAR-T cell therapy in B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia].

C Lu, J Xu, H Mei

Abstract readReviewEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Review in Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

C LuInstitute of Hematology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei Clinical Medical Center of Cell Therapy for Neoplastic Disease, Wuhan 430022, China.
J XuInstitute of Hematology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei Clinical Medical Center of Cell Therapy for Neoplastic Disease, Wuhan 430022, China.
H MeiInstitute of Hematology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei Clinical Medical Center of Cell Therapy for Neoplastic Disease, Wuhan 430022, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approximately 50% of patients suffering from relapsed/refractory B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R B-ALL), experience relapse within one year, with around 60% of these relapses being antigen-positive, despite the transformative impact of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy. The mechanisms underlying relapse are primarily associated with tumor heterogeneity, CAR-T cell dysfunction, subopimal in vivo expansion and persistence, and an inhibitory immune microenvironment. This review aims to investigate salvage strategies designed to enhance outcomes for patients undergoing relapse or disease progression following the CAR-T cell therapy. These strategies include a second CAR-T cell infusion that targets either the same antigen or an alternative target, the administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors, and the utilization of novel targeted therapies including monoclonal antibodies, antibody-conjugated drugs and small molecule compounds aimed at mitigating CD19-positive relapse or overcoming CAR-T cell resistance. Nevertheless, achieving improved long-term survival for these patients continues be challenging.

Indexed as

Antigens, CD19Immunotherapy, AdoptiveSalvage TherapyHumansPrecursor B-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaReceptors, Chimeric AntigenRecurrenceAntigens, CD19Receptors, Chimeric Antigen

Identifiers

PMID39622764
PMCPMC11579761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.