ReviewZhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi2024
[Congenital dysfibrinogenemia: current status and challenges in diagnosis and treatment].
Review in Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rapid laboratory identification of fibrinogen Longmont: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Congenital dysfibrinogenemia (CDF) is the most common type of congenital fibrinogen disorders, characterized by dysfunctional fibrinogen. Its prevalence is significantly underestimated due to the absence of obvious clinical symptoms in most patients. In addition to bleeding manifestations, patients with CDF may experience thrombotic events or pregnancy-related complications. Fibrinogen antigen assays and molecular heritability analyses can help differentiate CDF from other types of congenital fibrinogen disorders. The clinical presentation of CDF varies significantly among individuals, and there is a lack of routine laboratory methods to effectively predict the risk of bleeding or thrombosis in these patients, in addition to their personal and family histories. This poses challenges in the clinical management of patients with CDF, particularly during the perioperative period or pregnancy. Further registry-based and prospective studies are needed to improve our understanding of this disease and guide clinical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.