Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39622708›Full record

ArticleJMIR human factors2024

The Added Value of Using Video in Out-of-Hours Primary Care Telephone Triage Among General Practitioners: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

Mette Amalie Nebsbjerg, Katrine Bjørnshave Bomholt, Claus Høstrup Vestergaard, Morten Bondo Christensen, Linda Huibers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR human factors, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Primary care video consulting: a view from Northern Europe.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mette Amalie NebsbjergResearch Unit for General Practice, Bartholins Allé 2, Aarhus, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark, 45 24647244.ORCID 0000-0003-3934-3433
Katrine Bjørnshave BomholtResearch Unit for General Practice, Bartholins Allé 2, Aarhus, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark, 45 24647244.ORCID 0000-0001-8645-7885
Claus Høstrup VestergaardResearch Unit for General Practice, Bartholins Allé 2, Aarhus, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark, 45 24647244.ORCID 0000-0003-2916-1548
Morten Bondo ChristensenResearch Unit for General Practice, Bartholins Allé 2, Aarhus, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark, 45 24647244.ORCID 0000-0002-8342-7418
Linda HuibersResearch Unit for General Practice, Bartholins Allé 2, Aarhus, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark, 45 24647244.ORCID 0000-0002-5048-3026

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Many countries have introduced video consultations in primary care both inside and outside of office hours. Despite some relational and technical limitations, general practitioners (GPs) have reported the benefits of video use in the daytime as it provides faster and more flexible access to health care. Studies have indicated that video may be specifically valuable in out-of-hours primary care (OOH-PC), but additional information on the added value of video use is needed. Objective: This study aimed to investigate triage GPs' perspectives on video use in GP-led telephone triage in OOH-PC by exploring their reasons for choosing video use and its effect on triage outcome, the decision-making process, communication, and invested time. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional questionnaire study among GPs performing telephone triage in the OOH-PC service in the Central Denmark Region from September 5, 2022, until December 21, 2022. The questionnaire was integrated into the electronic patient registration system as a pop-up window appearing after every third video contact. This setup automatically linked background data on the contact, patient, and GP to the questionnaire data. We used descriptive analyses to describe reasons for and effects of video use and GP evaluation, stratified by patient age. Results: A total of 2456 questionnaires were completed. The most frequent reasons for video use were to assess the severity (n=1951, 79.4%), to increase the probability of self-care (n=1279, 52.1%), and to achieve greater certainty in decision-making (n=810, 33%) (multiple answers were possible for reasons of video use). In 61.9% (n=1516) of contacts, the triage GPs anticipated that the contact would have resulted in a different triage outcome if video had not been used. Use of video resulted in a downgrading of severity level in 88.3% (n=1338) of cases. Triage GPs evaluated the use of video as positive in terms of their decision-making process (n=2358, 96%), communication (n=2214, 90.1%), and invested time (n=2391, 97.3%). Conclusions: Triage GPs assessed that the use of video in telephone triage did affect their triage outcome, mostly by downgrading the level of care needed. The participating triage GPs found video in OOH-PC to be of added value, particularly in communication and the decision-making process.

Indexed as

After-Hours CareGeneral PractitionersPrimary Health CareTelephoneTriageAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesDenmarkFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesTelemedicineVideo Recordingafter-hours caregeneral practitionersprimary health carereferral and consultationremote consultationtelemedicinetriage

Identifiers

PMID39622708
PMCPMC11611789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.