ArticleEuropean journal of sport science2025
Systemic hypoxia has a larger effect on reducing the external load at lower exercise intensity during heart rate clamped cycling.
Article in European journal of sport science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The effects of acute hypoxic exposure on mechanical output and internal responses during cycling with heart rate (HR) clamped at lactate thresholds 1 and 2 (LT1 and LT2, respectively) were investigated. On separate days, 12 trained males cycled for 15 min at a clamped HR corresponding to LT1 and LT2 under normoxic or hypoxic conditions (simulated altitude of ∼3500 m and inspired oxygen fraction of 13.6%). Power output (PO), arterial oxygen saturation, ventilatory and perceptual responses were measured every 3 min, with metabolic response assessed pre- and post-exercise. At LT1, PO was consistently lower in hypoxia compared to normoxia (p < 0.01). At LT2, PO was not different between normoxia and hypoxia at 3 and 6 min (both p > 0.42) but was significantly lower in hypoxia at 9, 12 and 15 min (all p < 0.04). Overall, hypoxia induced a greater decrease in PO at LT1 (-33.3% ± 11.3%) than at LT2 (-18.0 ± 14.7%) compared to normoxia. Ventilatory, perceptual and metabolic responses were influenced by exercise intensity (all p < 0.01) but not environmental conditions (all p > 0.17). A simulated altitude of ∼3500 m is more effective in reducing cycling PO at LT1 than LT2 during HR clamped cycling while maintaining other internal loads. Therefore, normobaric hypoxia provides a greater benefit via a larger decrease in the mechanical constraints of exercise at lower exercise intensities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.