ArticleJMIR medical education2024
Using ChatGPT in Nursing: Scoping Review of Current Opinions.
Article in JMIR medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating and Validating Large Language Models for Health Education on Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: 2-Phase Study With Expert Ratings and a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Trial
- Artificial Intelligence Integration in U.S. Healthcare Professional Degree Programs: A Rapid Scoping Review.Research square · 2026Article
- AI Tools for Teaching the Safe Administration of Medications in Nursing: A Scoping Review.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Review
- Review
- Attitudes of psychiatric nurses towards the integration of artificial intelligence applications to clinical care: a qualitative study in China.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Editorial stances on large Language models in leading nursing publications: a cross-sectional analysis.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Article
- Large Language Models in Nursing Education: Concept Analysis.JMIR nursing · 2025Review
- Chat generative pre-trained transformers era: pros and cons between nursing researchers in Egypt.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- ChatGPT Applications in Nursing: Current Status and Future Perspectives.Nursing open · 2025Review
- A Culturally Tailored Artificial Intelligence Chatbot (K-Bot) to Promote Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Among Korean Americans: Development and Usability Study.Asian/Pacific Island nursing journal · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Medical Education (2013-2024): A Scopus-Based Bibliometric Analysis.The East African health research journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Since the release of ChatGPT in November 2022, this emerging technology has garnered a lot of attention in various fields, and nursing is no exception. However, to date, no study has comprehensively summarized the status and opinions of using ChatGPT across different nursing fields. Objective: We aim to synthesize the status and opinions of using ChatGPT according to different nursing fields, as well as assess ChatGPT's strengths, weaknesses, and the potential impacts it may cause. Methods: This scoping review was conducted following the framework of Arksey and O'Malley and guided by the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews). A comprehensive literature research was conducted in 4 web-based databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and CINHAL) to identify studies reporting the opinions of using ChatGPT in nursing fields from 2022 to September 3, 2023. The references of the included studies were screened manually to further identify relevant studies. Two authors conducted studies screening, eligibility assessments, and data extraction independently. Results: A total of 30 studies were included. The United States (7 studies), Canada (5 studies), and China (4 studies) were countries with the most publications. In terms of fields of concern, studies mainly focused on "ChatGPT and nursing education" (20 studies), "ChatGPT and nursing practice" (10 studies), and "ChatGPT and nursing research, writing, and examination" (6 studies). Six studies addressed the use of ChatGPT in multiple nursing fields. Conclusions: As an emerging artificial intelligence technology, ChatGPT has great potential to revolutionize nursing education, nursing practice, and nursing research. However, researchers, institutions, and administrations still need to critically examine its accuracy, safety, and privacy, as well as academic misconduct and potential ethical issues that it may lead to before applying ChatGPT to practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.